AIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications
question
Sent by:
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE:
Dba_tab_modifications question
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
"Grabowy,
Chris" To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications
question
> -Original Message-
> From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications question
>
>
> Thanks Prakash.
>
> I was poking around in Metalink and discove
Information Network
"Grabowy,
Chris" To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE:
Dba_tab_modifications question
Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications question
> >
> >
> > Hey Prakash,
> >
> > I never knew about that dictionary table,
Precisely :)
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
So DBA/ALL/USER_TAB_MODIFICATIONS cannot be used to determine an accurate
count of how many records were updated, but it can used to determine if the
table has been upd
;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications question
> >
> >
> > Hey Prakash,
> >
is" To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications
question
for Life is here: http://www.gospelcom.net
>
> ** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of
my
> employer or clients **
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 20
y my own and not those of
my
> employer or clients **
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modific
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Dba_tab_modifications question
>
>
> John:
>
> Not being so choosy, MONITORING is subject to latching. There
> is a latch
> called 'hash table allocation/modification latch'
> which keeps the modifi
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications question
>
>
> Hey Prakash,
>
> I never knew about that dictionary table, so I looked it up
> and found...
>
> The
*
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications question
> >
> >
> > Hey Prak
statements above are entirely my own and not those of my
employer or clients **
> -Original Message-
> From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Dba_tab_modifications quest
Chris, this table was modified around 3am and I checked this view around
10am. Maybe I need to create a TAR.
Prakash
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hey Prakash,
I never knew about that dictionary table, so I looked it
Hey Prakash,
I never knew about that dictionary table, so I looked it up and found...
These views describe tables that have been modified since the last time
table statistics were gathered on them. The views are populated only for
tables with the MONITORING attribute. They are not populated imme
17 matches
Mail list logo
