Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-23 Thread Stephane Faroult
Greg Moore wrote: > > Cary, > > In a TKPROF report, there is a small table at the top. It includes a column > for CPU time and another for Elapsed Time. > > Suppose the total line shows CPU = 3.00 and elapsed = 5.00. You would think > that the two seconds difference would be for waits, but th

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-23 Thread Greg Moore
Cary, In a TKPROF report, there is a small table at the top. It includes a column for CPU time and another for Elapsed Time. Suppose the total line shows CPU = 3.00 and elapsed = 5.00. You would think that the two seconds difference would be for waits, but that doesn't seem to be true. Since

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-22 Thread Cary Millsap
0.010340 second ~ 10/1,000 second = 10ms (= 1/100 second) If the number had been on the order of 0.001 (1ms) or less, it would've looked more IPC-like.   Cary Millsap Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hotsos.com -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:38

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-22 Thread Greg Moore
> the latency per call on the "SQL*Net message > from client" event looked suspiciously LAN-like > (order of 10ms), not IPC-like (order of 1ms or less) > Oracle Kernel EventDurationCallsAvg > -- -- -- > SQL

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-22 Thread S B
Hi Cary, I also have a same problem but could not solve it yet I have two m/cs and with identical DB layout etc and running the same pro*C code under same data volume.The top waits are as follows. 1.oracle-8.0.5 ( 2 processor/RAM 512 MB) Total run time 45 mins Event

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-22 Thread Cherie_Machler
llsap" otsos.com>cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: I/O EVENTS [EM

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-21 Thread Jack Silvey
Cary, This is greatness. Jack --- Cary Millsap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an example for you (Anjo, I hope you won't > mind). A prospect we > visited once upon a time had been fighting a > performance problem with an > Oracle Payroll program. They "knew" what their > problem was: very

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-21 Thread Cary Millsap
I have an example for you (Anjo, I hope you won't mind). A prospect we visited once upon a time had been fighting a performance problem with an Oracle Payroll program. They "knew" what their problem was: very clearly, v$system_event was telling them that their overwhelmingly dominant system perfor

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-21 Thread Jared . Still
oore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/2002 12:13 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: I/O EVENTS > So just looking at v$system_event is dangerous. > Looking

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-20 Thread Greg Moore
> So just looking at v$system_event is dangerous. > Looking v$system_event and v$sysstat > is much better but still not perfect. The third > way is ... (mail me ;-)) Anjo, Jared has an even hand on the tiller. Go ahead an post an informative example of how the v$ views don't allow you to di

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-20 Thread Anjo Kolk
In short: Oracle is either using CPU or is waiting on a resource. If oracle is waiting on a resource, it could be an Oracle event (v$system_event/v$session_event), BUT what about waits that are not registered there . like waiting for CPU, waiting for a memory page to be paged in .. So j

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-20 Thread Anjo Kolk
Download the YAPP paper ;-) Anjo. John Kanagaraj wrote: > Greg, > > > > Can I assume a i/o bottleneck from the following > > > > > > select * from v$system_event > > > order by TIME_WAITED; > > > > No. Wait events may only make up a small amount of > > processing that Oracle > > is doing for

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-20 Thread John Kanagaraj
Hi Greg, > Maybe not one, but what about two? At the same time v$system_event is > checked a couple of times, so you can see a time slice, > v$sysstat can be > checked, focusing on CPU used by this session, parse time cpu > and recursive > cpu usage. One view gives wait time, one gives CPU ti

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-16 Thread Greg Moore
John, > Hmm I wouldn't think so. If there were just _one_ overall view that I > could check to determine an Oracle bottleneck, it would be this view. Maybe not one, but what about two? At the same time v$system_event is checked a couple of times, so you can see a time slice, v$sysstat can b

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-16 Thread John Kanagaraj
Greg, > > Can I assume a i/o bottleneck from the following > > > > select * from v$system_event > > order by TIME_WAITED; > > No. Wait events may only make up a small amount of > processing that Oracle > is doing for you. Hmm I wouldn't think so. If there were just _one_ overall view that

RE: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-16 Thread Hately Mike
Hi, far better than getting individual descriptions is to research for yourself (this isn't an RTFM message honestly). Good sources of information for this subject are Anjo Kolk's excellent document on wait events and enqueues (http://www.dbatoolbox.com/WP2001/dbamisc/events.pdf) and the Oracle do

Re: I/O EVENTS

2002-05-16 Thread Greg Moore
> Can I assume a i/o bottleneck from the following > > select * from v$system_event > order by TIME_WAITED; No. Wait events may only make up a small amount of processing that Oracle is doing for you. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Greg Moore INET: