Re: RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread rgaffuri
is obvious. The test says its. 1,3,4 How does using large extents help this? What about a higher minextents value? Title: Re: OCP Architecture question With respect to evaluating answer number one, its a bad question, because you have know way to know whether the context

RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread Ed Sherman
Ryan, I will research the answer but I have an urgentquestion. Do you have SelfTest Software for the SQL and PL/SQL test or do you have the Architecure and Administration SelfTest Software? Thanks, Ed -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On

Re: RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread rgaffuri
: OCP Architecture question Ryan, I will research the answer but I have an urgent question. Do you have SelfTest Software for the SQL and PL/SQL test or do you have the Architecure and Administration SelfTest Software? Thanks, Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread Stephen Lee
1. Maybe, maybe not. To make a point, take it to a ridiculous extreme: Suppose you have a tablespace of 100M with two rollback segments made of 1M extents sizes. Then each segment must use 2M each (minextents must be at least 2) which means either segmentcould possibly grow touse 98M if

Re: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
A lot of those multiple choice question are best approached from a reverse standpoint, much like a lot of my recent election experiences. You look at the choices and cross out the ones which are definitely not it until you whittled it down to the number of supposedly correct choices you need.

RE: RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
: 2003/08/15 Fri AM 01:14:23 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OCP Architecture question With respect to evaluating answer number one, it's a bad question, because you have know way to know whether the context is supposed to be a) assume

Re: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-15 Thread Jared Still
Ah, the Sherlock Holmes method. I've often used the same method on multiple choice tests with meaningless questions and obscure answers. When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth I think this is how I passed the Oracle 7 Beta tests, which

Re: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-14 Thread Tim Gorman
Title: Re: OCP Architecture question They all allow the RBS to be bigger. More space available for RBS roughly equals fewer ORA-01555, for most situations... on 8/14/03 6:24 PM, Ryan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im using the self test software and here is a question... I dont like

RE: OCP Architecture question

2003-08-14 Thread Cary Millsap
Title: Re: OCP Architecture question With respect to evaluating answer number one, its a bad question, because you have know way to know whether the context is supposed to be a) assume a fixed rollback segment size, but use fewer, larger extents; or b) make the rollback segment larger