Title: ORA-00600 signalled while mounting the database from the second instance of Oracle9i RAC
Have you looked up on Metalink? there is ton of information out
there.
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot
Where are the table "e" and "d" in your query?
Guang
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Liu, Jack wrote:
> Hi,
> I got this error when I run my procedure:
>
> Errors in file /ora817/app/oracle/admin/ORCL/udump/orcl_ora_4345.trc
>
> ksedmp: internal or fatal error
> ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [
Title: RE: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [19944], [], [], [], [],
[], [], []
Good
solution ;-)
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jamadagni,
Rajendra
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:30
PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
If it's not a prod. Database which it doesn't seem to be and you can bear the loss of
one week's data. Use the create controlfile, create a new controlfile and open the
database with resetlogs.
Thanks,
Inder
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipient
Title: RE: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [19944], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Your solution is described in details here ... http://tinyurl.com/g8eu
HTH
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot
Quoting "Farnsworth, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 8.1.7 on NT. Got it fixed though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> dave
>
Dave,
Instead of just telling us it's fixed. Perhaps it would be better if
you actually told us how it got fixed, please.
Thank you.
--
Lyndon Tiu
>
> -Original Message-
>
Looks like memory leak, and fixing it by restarting Oracle service proves
it.
Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:23 AM
> Someone suggested a reboot so I figured I
Dave,
When I've seen this, it's usually because I have added a new database on the
machine and the various SHM kennel settings are no longer appropriate for
all the instances. Have you added a new instance since the last time you
restarted this instance? How long has the machine been up, it coul
8.1.7 on NT. Got it fixed though.
Thanks,
dave
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:21 AM
To: Farnsworth, Dave; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OS and version?
Possibilities from Metalink:
Increase the SHMMAX kernel parameter to 2139095040 (2Gb-8Mb).
See note 70240.1
Jay
>>
The previous attachment was filtered out by the ListGuru mailing
software at fatcity.com because binary attachments are not appropriate
for mailing lists. If you want a copy of the attachment which was
removed, contact the sender directly and ask for it to be sent to
you by private E-mail.
This
OS and version?
Possibilities from Metalink:
Increase the SHMMAX kernel parameter to 2139095040 (2Gb-8Mb).
See note 70240.1
Jay
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/14/03 06:33AM >>>
After my nightly cold backup and during the database startup I got this error;
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-0060
Someone suggested a reboot so I figured I would start by just shutting down the Oracle
database service. I restarted the service and the database is up and running. You
gotta love the windoze OS. When in doubt reboot the service or the server.
Dave
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, Fe
Undskyld! for the mistake of names. Ah yes, the 10015 and the adjust_scn.
Those were the days.
K Gopalakrishnan wrote:
Mogens:
Yes. You are right. You have to bump the SCNs globally
(i.e. across all data files to higher number, say 1 Billion)
using the event 10015 and ADJUST_SCN. Then we c
Mogens:
Yes. You are right. You have to bump the SCNs globally
(i.e. across all data files to higher number, say 1 Billion)
using the event 10015 and ADJUST_SCN. Then we can safely
open the database and rebuild that.
KG
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
-Original Message-
Norgaard
Sent
Here is another product that goes after ORA-600:
http://www.ubTools.com/cgi-bin/ib/ikonboard.cgi?act=Pages;page=iorabugfinder
The creator, Danisment Unal, used to be on the list.
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-
Mogens,
You meant K. Gopal (aka X$KG) is on the right track... and not Kirti. ;)
I do not recall posting in this thread.
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
This response from Oracle is not a good one. Kirti
Ferenc,
There's this new FREE product on the Metalink site. It's called ORA-600
Lookup (I don't bother to bookmark it, just do a search on that and the
first one in the search list is the link to the product). You put in
the version number, the first argument on the ora-600 and then, if
there is a
Mogens I do agree that this ora-600 [2662] is in the code that handle
SCN numbers, since SCN handling is used
many places in the code the stack trace that show which path throw the
code you took is necessary if there
is no hits on metalink fits the problem ;-)
Mogens Nørgaard wrote:
This respo
This response from Oracle is not a good one. Kirti is on the right track
regarding the SCN stuff as far as I remember. Other than that, I know
that Peter Gram and Bjorn Engsig (among a lot of other guys) might be
able to suggest something, so I've CC'ed them.
I have my own law on ora-600s: If y
Hi guys,
This is what I get from Oracle
==
Hi Sinardy,
I've check several bug looking for the cause of this problem. However, what I've found
is that Development could not diagnosis the problem other than the possibily hat there
was
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=153788.1
Can be used to look up such errors and also examine the stack trace. The lookup
function does not return information on all the 600 error codes, it does not return
any for yours.
Ian MacGregor
Stanford Linear Accelerator Ce
Other than the allow_resetlogs_corruption, _disable_logging also will
greet you with OERI-2662 if the shutdown is not normal.
KG
--- Sinardy Xing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hit by this error
>
> ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2662], [0], [54151123],
> [0],
> [541
Sinardy:
Have you force opened the database? (_allow_resetlogs_corruption).
In this case the SCN Mismatch (block SCN vs Currnet SCN) is causing the
OERI-2662, and you need to bump the SCNS globally to get the database
up.
Speak to Oracle Support and ask for the details to bump the SCN, then
you
Sinardy
ORA-0600 is really an encoded message from Oracle that reads :
'Thank you for helping find yet another bug in our software. You can now
release your sphincter (some herbal tea might help), especially if this has
cropped up in production. We suggest you do not try to solve this one by
y
Satish,
Use the JDBC driver from the 9.0.1 database. The 8i JDBC driver causes this
error.
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SATISH P
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:34 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subje
Satish - I think that means you get to be a pioneer. File it as a TAR.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi ,
we are getting the error ORA-00600: intern
This error happens when 8i jdbc driver is used to connect to 9i database. we
reolved this by using 9i jdbc classes file. This error prevents the client
from opening connection to database.
-Shaleen
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Th
Try scanning your trace file at
http://www.ubtools.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html.
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi ,
we are getting the error ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:
I looked on Metalink and found several hits. Most of them point to
Note:147731.1. I states you can get this error when using the 8i JDBC
driver to connect to a 9i database.
Just in case you didn't know, ora-600 is just a catch all error that you can
get for many, many reasons. You when searchi
Usually, at least 4 systemstate dumps, level 10 are also recommended.
Tech support will be greatful for those. I believe that RDA dumps
systemstate
at least twice.
On 2002.07.25 01:13 A. Bardeen wrote:
> Leslie,
>
> The trace file should have the current SQL for the
> session that generated t
It means you should patch to 8.1.7.4.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:54:14AM -0800, Leslie Lu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a 817 db on NT. In the alter log, I have the
> following error since 7/15. (The error repeats about
> 30 times.)
>
> Mon Jul 15 16:11:32 2002
> Errors in file
> D:\Ora
ul Vincent
uce.ac.uk> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: ORA-00600: interna
Unfortunately, support is correct. But to add a bit more: 600/12333
indicates that the two task layer in Oracle (just above sqlnet) has received
a function code, that it does not understand. I've been involved in a few
cases with this error, and we did also not reach any conclusion. My pers
Purely out of interest, Brian, how do you find this page within MetaLink? I
always prefer being able to navigate to these things myself within MetaLink,
rather than having loads of bookmarks to specific MetaLink pages, but when I
tried to find it, I didn't even know where to start looking! Can you
Follow the link, put in your Oracle version, first argument of the
ORA-00600, and paste the top of your stack trace, and wha-lait's magic,
or what I like to call "FM".
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=153788.1
Brian P. MacLean
Orac
Hi,
Analyzing ORA-600 trace files for the heap corruptions doesn't make sense. Because,
this corruption errors are thrown if
someone tries to work on this corrupted memory region. So, the information in trace
files doesn't come from the corrupter.
You should catch the corrupter. There are some
HI
*
>From Metalink
Doc ID: Note:47411.1
Type: REFERENCE
Status: PUBLISHED
Content Type: TEXT/PLAIN
Creation Date: 26-SEP-1997
Last Revision Date: 20-MAR-2002
Note: For additional ORA-600 related information please read
[NOTE:146580.1]
PURPOSE:
This
Kamel,
this will be down to Oracle to fix. The dump itself is caused by a memory
corruption.
It may be worth running some hardware diagnostics on the box itself to check
out the RAM.
Otherwise you need to push Oracle for an answer.
The usual questions apply:
Have you relinked anything?
Have you
Bunyamin K.
KaradenizSent: 04 April 2002 09:23To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: ORA-00600 error
Yes I am running 8.1.7.3 .. Is this a bug ?
What will I do then?
Bunyamin K.
Karadeniz
Oracle DBA / DeveloperCivilian IT DepartmentHa
in a database is inversely proportional to that
of its DBA.
- Original Message -
From:
James Morle
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:33
PM
Subject: RE: ORA-00600 error
Are you running
8.1.7.3?
This is a known bug, with a
Is any of export(exp) job is being terminated abruptly? This is the main
reason for this message. It was corrected in ver 7.3.4.5.
Regards
Rafiq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:06:18 -0800
Bunyamin,
I think yo
Title: Message
Are you running
8.1.7.3?
This is a known bug, with a patch
available.
Regards
James
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bunyamin K.
KaradenizSent: 03 April 2002 18:21To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Bunyamin,
I think you better check the following doc. from
metalink...
START *
Doc ID: Note:31056.1
Type: REFERENCE
Status: PUBLISHED
Content Type: TEXT/PLAIN
Creation Date: 31-DEC-1996
Last Revision Date: 20-MAR-2002
Note: For additional O
Hello,
Your problem is raised in Oracle's internal kzckini() function. This
function is a function of Oracle's SECURITY LAYER.
But, your trace doesn't include PROCESS STATE, CURSOR DUMP etc. Without
them it's not possible to see what is happing. But you can search
metalink by "ORA-600 kzckini ks
12/02 06:33 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Ora-00600 running 64 bit and 32 bit databases
Sorry... our SA just fessed up... he changed the UID for Oracle on the OS
on
the same d
sorry for the inconvenience. It was more an informational... have you seen
it before... not tell me what the error stack didn't tell me. You will see
that it has since been resolved.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi
Sorry... our SA just fessed up... he changed the UID for Oracle on the OS on
the same day we started the Financials install... but forgot to bounce the
listener, and forgot to tell anyone.. but we are now consistent with
Production UID for Oracle... which is really all that matters, right.
Anyway
Hi,
WE need the error stack (the stack from kesdmp) for further investigation.
>From your message it looks like there is something went wrong in the
security layer. May be something to do with OS authentication or
similar to that.
So just post the errorstack.
!
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishn
The itar creation process now includes a utility where you can either lookup Ora-600
messages or have it examine the stack trace from an ORA-7445 dump. I had it analyze a
stack trace this morning. The result of using the utility is a list of links to
articles Metalink considers germane to th
>> From: John Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:01:54 -
>> Subject: ORA-00600 errors
>>
>>can anyone tell me waht these errors might mean?
>>
>>Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/vaddev/udump/vaddev_ora_6942.trc:
>>ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17172], [0],
Ashoke [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mon, February 25, 2002 7:00 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: ORA-00600 errors
>
> Check the content of trace file.
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: Mul
Check the content of trace file.
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
can anyone tell me waht these errors might mean?
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/vaddev/udump/vaddev_ora_6942.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, a
state dumps
in the trace file), that indicated some sort of corruptions. However, I
couldn't verify this.
Thanks, Bjørn.
Original Message
Subject:
Re: ora-00600 error
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:3
This comes up with an application that I manage. The error is a generic one
which indicates that there is a problem in the communication between the
client and the server process. In my situation, a Forms application, this
occurs most often when a session gets timed out after being inactive f
12333 it is often related with communications problems
and resetting of them. Seldom related with parsing of
creation of objects. In the case of network problem
check the NLS and ask users if there are receiving
sporadically TNS errors.
Check also if there are some 4031. Maybe the reason it
is th
Call 1-800-223-1711, give them your CSI and tell them that I sent you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sirisha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:25 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: ORA-00600
>
>
>
> Hi
> I get this error ORA-00600
What version of Oracle are you running? I've seen this ORA-00600 mentioned
in two different patchset fixes (but I guess the bugs weren't public, 'cause
I couldn't view any details on them, so I can't be sure that the other
arguments in the 600 are referring to the same type of error you're having
call support.
joe
Sirisha wrote:
>
> Hi
> I get this error ORA-00600 when i try to execute a stored procedure.
>
> The stored procedure gets compiled perfectly but gives this error at
> run-time while executing it from a java code. This is what i found in
> the alert log.
>
> Tue Sep 18 04
> Hi sirisha,
> ORA-00600
> ORA-00600internal message code, arguments: [num], [?], [?], [?], [?], [?]
> Cause:This is a catch-all internal message for ORACLE program exceptions.
> It indicates that a process has met a low-level, unexpected condition.
> Various causes of this message include:
Sent by: Subject: Re: ORA-00600 on
Production DB - Need advice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/06/2001 02:23
PM
Please respond to
ORACLE-L
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by:
> cc:
Denny Koovakattu
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent
I thought that was the question, how to get service on an ITAR. Oh well, it
was Monday after all.
Ruth
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 5:12 PM
> Ruth Gramolini wrote:
> >
> > 1-800-223-1711
> >
> > I have
Ruth Gramolini wrote:
>
> 1-800-223-1711
>
> I have what used to be Silver Support and that works. When I had wht used
> to be Bronze Support I didn't have an 800 number.
>
> Good luck!
> Ruth
and they are going to tell you that you have to file an iTAR with
metalink first.
--
Bill "Shrek"
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
ORA-00600 on Production DB - Need advice
.tenet.edu
08/06/2001 12:44 PM
Hi David,
To get the proper o
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ate.vt.us> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re: ORA-00600 on
Production DB - Need advice
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 08/06/2001 02:23
> PM
tres.com>cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: ORA-00600 on Production DB -
Need advice/St
acle DBA, OCP
AISD
512-414-1002
Denny Koovakattu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Subject: Re: ORA-00600 on Production
DB - Need advice
Wong, Bing"
Micro.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: ORA-00600 on Production
by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ORA-00600 on
Production DB - Need advice
Thank you Kirti,
I saw some incorrect usages of iOraBugFinder. So, I added more explanation to
iOraBugFinder page.
in fact, I wasn't going to analyze alert.log. because alert.log doesn't include
detailed information. If alert.log is uploaded, it should be uploaded with Bug
depth of 0. Bug d
This may not be related to your problem. My shop had problem with 8.1.7,
HP-UX 11.0 - 32 bit. We encountered memory leak bug. Oracle knew about it
and had not had a patch yet, I think. So we disable the db handle caching.
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Try calling on your tar. That is what they have told me to do. Just waiting
doesn't help!
Ruth
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:58 PM
>
> Mondays, gotta love em, they make Fridays worth the wait. I've g
David,
The ulimit looks okay to me. The value shown is equivalent to 'unlimited'.
While you are waiting for the OWS, try getting your alert.log analyzed for
ORA-600 at
http://www.unal-bilisim.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html. It
may find something that you may not have come across. A
75 matches
Mail list logo
