RE: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld.

2001-07-06 Thread Kevin Kostyszyn
Actually, I have Ari's product. I have to admit, it is a pretty neat little tool. The idea is that you don't need to lug around a laptop with a wireless Ricochet modem. Yeah, that would be a much better combination, you could ultimately do more in a shorter amount of time. But, with my Palm

Re: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld...

2001-07-05 Thread DBarbour
If only it were this simple: ..quantify the amount of time and money their companies would save if their DBAs.could remotely... remove from the database a user who is running a command that is holding up the system. David A. Barbour Oracle DBA, OCP AISD 512-414-1002

RE: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld.

2001-07-05 Thread Post, Ethan
I for one think Ari and his company need to be commended. In the future you and I will be capable of admin'ing and monitoring multiple databases via handhelds. Larger consulting companies will likely have teams of DBA's that are responsible for large pools of databases. New databases will be

RE: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld.

2001-07-05 Thread Jenkins, Michael
I wonder if a similar thought was echoed in 1991? Maybe all of the DBAs that were former DB2, etc DBAs could offer some war stories here. It's funny that databases have become more cumbersome to manage, not easier IMHO. DBAs have to understand more technologies that are outside the RDBMS box

RE: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld.

2001-07-05 Thread Post, Ethan
Michael, No not all databases are the same but many are. DBA's as a whole are extremely inefficient. Most of us well know that we could automate much of what we do if we just sat down and thought about it for a second. I mean come on, why should a DBA have to actually check dozens of V$ views

RE: OT: Ari and his company have been noted in InfoWorld.

2001-07-05 Thread DBarbour
Ethan, Your scenario reminds me that I should have invested in paper company stocks when the paperless office was being theorized. Much of the inefficiency in which we indulge is due to extremely poor craftsmanship on the part of the people who produce packaged applications. When the