RE: OT -- # tables in your db (was: Slow database)

2001-03-30 Thread Cherie_Machler
Lisa, No we did not. It's still there. It's a ridiculous design but it was there when I got here and it's not going away anytime soon. Cherie Machler Gelco Information Network "Koivu, Lisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/29/2001 06:58:20 PM To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

RE: OT -- # tables in your db (was: Slow database)

2001-03-29 Thread Koivu, Lisa
Title: RE: OT -- # tables in your db (was: Slow database) Nope, Cherie wins.  Before I left, I realized I had a database that had 19,000+ tables in it.  There were a ridiculous number of schemas.  Cherie, did you guys ever bust that database up into two?  -Original Message- From

Re: OT -- # tables in your db (was: Slow database)

2001-03-29 Thread Alex Apostolopoulos
> "very complex" at 300 tables. > > I checked on mine, excluding SYS and SYSTEM, I have 3185 tables. 159 > database links. 1064 views, again excluding SYS and SYSTEM. > > This is on Oracle 7.3.4. > > I am sure this is not the smallest db out there... > > (It's my birthday, so what if I feel a bi

Re: OT -- # tables in your db (was: Slow database)

2001-03-29 Thread Rodd Holman
Happy Birthday Patrice! Here you go: SQL> select object_type, count(*) 2 from dba_objects 3 where owner != 'SYS' 4 andowner != 'SYSTEM' 5 andowner != 'CTXSYS' 6 andowner != 'DBSNMP' 7 group by object_type; OBJECT_TYPE COUNT(*) --- -- DATA