RE: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Stephen Lee
t tape and bailing wire rig of soft links > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:59 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: One for bash experts > > > Yes, there ar

Re: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Reginald . W . Bailey
Obviously the NAWK executable, nawk, is not in the path or is not installed. Find out where the file is located using the find command, then include that directory in the PATH statement in the .profile file. RWB ===

RE: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Molina, Gerardo
We use a case statement to setup various utilities such as nawk/gawk, mailx/mail, which gets selected depends on platform (uname -s). This makes our scripts portable across various Unix platforms as well as Linux. Gerardo -Original Message- Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:24 AM To: Mult

RE: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Jared . Still
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: One for bash experts It's looking for the command "nawk" - either find a source package and install it, or change your script to call awk instead. I'm not sure of

RE: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Matthew Zito
Title: Message It's looking for the command "nawk" - either find a source package and install it, or change your script to call awk instead.  I'm not sure of any differences between awk and nawk, but you could give it a shot.   Thanks, Matt --Matthew ZitoGridApp SystemsEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: One for bash experts....

2003-08-04 Thread Stephen Lee
The Linux cognoscenti, in all their infinite wisdom, have decided you should no longer be using nawk; you should be using gawk instead. And you can no longer expect things that were in /usr/bin to be there henceforth. Again, in their infinite wisdom, they have decided that there is a more approp