Unix is harder.
ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2002, Number 026
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:39:53 -0500
Subject: Operating system choice
The topic of Oracle on NT vs. Oracle on UNIX has been addressed many
times before, but in my
But is is longer?
Uh, to learn that is?
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:21 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Number 026
Unix is harder.
ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2002, Number 026
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri,
To add to Kimberly's comments regarding ease of administration:
There was some data available a couple of years ago attesting to
the fact that it took quite a few more man hours to administer NT
servers than Unix servers.
Part of that could be due to the Unix being more mature and there
is a
I will start by saying that I prefer Unix but I am not actually
a Microsoft hater per say (despite some of my comments).
You get much more control over the performance of a Unix machine
to tune it to the particular purpose of the apps running on it.
I feel its more easily expandable. With the
Server on Intel HW?
Choose Linux to run your Oracle server.
JP
-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:41 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
The topic of Oracle on NT vs. Oracle on UNIX has been addressed many
times before, but in my
We have both. NT is MUCH easier to manage and set up. But unless you put
some money in the hardware it is not as stable. Our applications have lots
of interfaces to other servers. Lots of scheduled batch jobs. This seems
to cause a lot of processes to get started that never stop. They tie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thing, but I also worry about the stability and availability of my database
that I would be presenting to my customers. If anyone has any insights,
statistics, facts or links to documentation presenting such, I'd sure
appreciate the help.
i can only relate my