Yeah,
I created my Solaris Intel CDs at the weekend but it won't help me with 9i
unfortunately 'cos the download's only for Sparc architecture.
Maybe I'll need to spend cash. =(
Regards,
Mike Hately
Oracle DBA
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INE
Wanna bet?
"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Fuelspot
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:52 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Nope. HP-UX and AIX are in the next batc
Nope. HP-UX and AIX are in the next batch. BSOD will be there in
August and Linux not before the late October. May be you'll even have
to wait for the last week of Novebmer to give thanks to the Oracle Corp.
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Multiple recipients o
I am in the process of putting Solaris on an Intel box at home . Next step
is Oracle as well.. if you are just testing ... it might work out
right for you.
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
That's definitely what th
ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Oracle 9i is on technet (NT)
I know some have 128Mb now, some of them we have are 256Mb, but we
can get
more memory.
Right now, we only have like 6 machines, but if it successfullly
runs 9i, I
am getting 4 of them for a small lab
Most Windows-based Oracle access is usually some sort of front-end access to
the database, which usually resides on a UNIX-based server.
Even Microsoft uses UNIX based databases behind the scenes :-)
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christopher Spence
> Subject: Re: Oracle 9i is on technet (NT)
>
> On Monday 04 June 2001 10:16, Christopher Spence wrote:
> > Now I would bet Linux will be next, not NT
>
> Interesting observation, should we start a pool? :)
>
> Jared
--
ion are easy if
> both are frozen."
>
> Christopher R. Spence
> Oracle DBA
> Fuelspot
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christopher Spence
> Subject: R
I vote we do.
I am actually trying to see if an Sun Ultra 1 will run Oracle 9i without any
problems. If it does, I will through like 25 of them on ebay.
"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Fuelspot
--
On Monday 04 June 2001 10:16, Christopher Spence wrote:
> Now I would bet Linux will be next, not NT
>
Interesting observation, should we start a pool? :)
Jared
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jared Still
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Se
That has been known for some time.
"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Fuelspot
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Does this prove
In a perfect world maybe, but 80% or more of the business world is using
some form of windows!!
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
It just proves what we all knew . Unix Not NT. Never NT ...
-Original Messa
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Oracle 9i is on technet (NT)
That's definitely what they do. Anyone want to sell me a Sparc box?
Not you
Spence, the shipping costs would bankrupt me !!!
= )
Now I would bet Linux will be next, not NT
"Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if
both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Fuelspot
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Does thi
Yea, Unix.
Like, Xenix, right?
|| -Original Message-
|| From: Kevin Lange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|| Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:10 PM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: Oracle 9i is on technet (NT)
||
||
|| It just proves what we all knew . Unix
It just proves what we all knew . Unix Not NT. Never NT ...
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Does this prove that they write Oracle on Solaris, then port it over to the
other platforms?
: )
Patrice Boivin
Sys
That's definitely what they do. Anyone want to sell me a Sparc box? Not you
Spence, the shipping costs would bankrupt me !!!
= )
Mike
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX:
Does this prove that they write Oracle on Solaris, then port it over to the
other platforms?
: )
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | D
Did *I* miss something?
I got mine in the mail well over a month ago...
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 6/3/2001 10:40 PM
for NT? I just went there, they had Solaris, not NT... did I miss
something?
>From: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>R
Oh heheh, (NT) means no text, not Nice try, I mean Windows NT.
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 6/3/01 10:40 PM
for NT? I just went there, they had Solaris, not NT... did I miss
something?
>From: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMA
What is NT? :)
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 6/3/01 10:40 PM
for NT? I just went there, they had Solaris, not NT... did I miss
something?
>From: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list O
for NT? I just went there, they had Solaris, not NT... did I miss
something?
>From: Christopher Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Oracle 9i is on technet (NT)
>Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 18:05:23 -0800
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
