RE: RE: Has anyone done any scalability work on dbms_lock?

2004-01-22 Thread Goulet, Dick
Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I make use of it to synchronize data upload programs for our testers. Can't have two instances of the upload program processing the same tester, they'd duplicate data. Anyhow, we normally run 4 instances of this program the dbms_lock package works

Re: RE: Has anyone done any scalability work on dbms_lock?

2004-01-22 Thread Jonathan Lewis
I came across a very nice example a while ago where there were 4 concurrent sessions feeding data into a holding table, and one session consuming from the table. The rules said that the consumer could not run while the producers were loading the table, but multiple producers were allowed to run.

Re: Re: Has anyone done any scalability work on dbms_lock?

2004-01-21 Thread ryan.gaffuri
, but I like it)... there is a nifty wrapper for DBMS_LOCK. I based my code off of that. From: Carel-Jan Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2004/01/21 Wed AM 08:24:25 EST To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Has anyone done any scalability work on dbms_lock

Re: RE: Has anyone done any scalability work on dbms_lock?

2004-01-21 Thread Nuno Pinto do Souto
Hmm, that's actually a very good idea. It might actually do the job here. Thanks. Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jamadagni, Rajendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if it is single instance you could also use global application contexts ... (alas they don't work in RAC across node) ... -- Please