RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Toepke, Kevin M
This is fixed in 9.0.1.3. I have verified it. -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:43 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis: The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look at a

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Simon . Anderson
Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis: The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look at any data, and given 'create view' as well can change data at will. You may be able to use the database in production, but only if your users can't access it

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Simon . Anderson
Gelco Information Network Connor McDonald To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE! Sent by: [EMA

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Cherie_Machler
McDonald To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE! S

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-02 Thread Connor McDonald
I'm pretty sure this has not been done... NOBODY(!) should be on 9012 in production - unless you're happy with zero security. As well as the reading-anything as Ian points out, with a little bit of playing around its also possible to destroy any data in the database (since a view is updatable if

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2

2002-07-02 Thread MacGregor, Ian A.
Did Oracle back port the patch to fix the ANSI-style jonn bug to 9.0.1.2? This bug allows one to read any table in the database despite the permission set. Ian MacGregor Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:23 AM To: Mult