Title: RE: any else try trace analyzer?
KG Since when it became free? Last time I checked it was a subscription model. Maybe things have changed ...
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views
And of course the Trace File Repository thing that Torben Holm from
Miracle made. Not half bad either. And free.
But nothing beats the Hotsos profiler in completeness and ability to
interpret the complex situations in these 10046 traces correct. And the
whole notion of not-accounted-for is cool
Dan:
Have you tried the itfprof at www.ubtools.com , which also gives lots
of meaningful info from the 10046 trace.
It is free, online, web based and what else you need ?
=
Have a nice day !!
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan,
Ban
I've done a little with it. It's free, which is a plus and it parses the trace file
and loads it into
database tables. The documentation is limited to a single readme, which is adequate.
The biggest problems
with it are that it requires you to run the analyzer as the user issuing the query, it
i
Title: RE: any else try trace analyzer?
it is a bit old, I like it ...
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts
It's an improvement over tkprof but still I think it doesn't come close
to the Hotsos Profiler.
Gudmundur
> Looks to be pretty new. I think it came from the Apps team.
> Its not even in Kytes new book.
>
> you can get it off of metalink. It gives you alot more info
> than tkprof when teamed w
