RE: Dedicated Server problem ORA-03113

2003-06-30 Thread Denham Eva
Yeah, so I have discovered when looking on metalink :-) Nice of you to answer anyway, appreciate it. Denham -Original Message- Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:10 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L ORA-3113 error is not very easy to track down. It's like ORA-600, but relates to is

RE: Dedicated Server problem ORA-03113

2003-06-30 Thread Kirtikumar Deshpande
ORA-3113 error is not very easy to track down. It's like ORA-600, but relates to issues in N/W communication with Oracle datbases. There are a number of notes/articles on Metalink discussing this error. Hopefully some of that information helps you. - Kirti --- Denham Eva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Dedicated Server problem ORA-03113

2003-06-29 Thread Denham Eva
That is the whole problem, there is no logged errors, or trace files. Everyone can connect via the MTS servers, no problem, however no one can connect via dedicated server. Go figure. Regards Denham -Original Message- Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:54 PM To: Multiple recipients of list O

Re: Dedicated Server problem ORA-03113

2003-06-28 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi! What does your alert log say? Or event log then? Maybe, for some reason, Oracle is unable to start new processes on your system. For MTS connection, no new processes are needed, but for dedicated, there are. Tanel. - Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMA

RE: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server

2002-05-16 Thread MacGregor, Ian A.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server multiplexing architecture like this: long-running SQL operations tying up a shared server, DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP calls tying up a shared server, various types of locks or slowly-serviced operations tyi

Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server

2002-05-16 Thread Tim Gorman
or 10 minutes causing other sessions > connected to it > to hang for 10 minutes? > > Jared > > > > > > "Tim Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 05/15/2002 09:58 PM > Please respond to ORACLE-L > > > To:

Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server

2002-05-16 Thread Jared . Still
15/2002 09:58 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server multiplexing architecture like this: long-running SQL operations tying up a shared server, DBMS_

Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server

2002-05-15 Thread Tim Gorman
Sergey, I think we'll need to clarify what is meant by "system overhead is reduced"... The "code path" for a SQL statement certainly increases dramatically with MTS, in comparison to the default "dedicated server" mechanism. After all, the command from the client hits the dispatcher process, wh

Re: Dedicated Server versus Shared Server

2002-05-15 Thread Sergey V Dolgov
Hello Eriovaldo, I think you mean shared mode is multithreaded configuration. The multithreaded server configuration (MTS) allows many user processes to share very few server processes. The user processes connect to a dispatcher background process, which routes client requests to the next avail

RE: dedicated server

2002-04-10 Thread Sutton, Reed
Hamid, What they mean by that is - assuming Unix here - set your ORACLE_SID, ORACLE_HOME, and ORACLE_BASE to the database you want to connect to. Then just issue svrmgrl or sqlplus. When you connect, you are connecting to the database specified in your ORACLE_SID variable. The same goes for N