I think most of us here will prefer Oracle
Sinardy
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 1:37 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Probably this has been posed million times, but I
really like to know. We'll have a meeting about this
in our company, and I'd love to contri
| Région des Maritimes, MPO
>
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Streeter, Lerone A LBX [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:27 PM
> To: Mult
recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| Subject: RE: might be really old topic, but please take a look
||
||
|| Leslie,
||
|| Sybase is what SQL Server is built from, I think. I don't
|| know much about
|| Sybase, but I Know that SQL Server 7 only has one
|| transaction log file (redo
|| log file), tha
From: Streeter, Lerone A LBX [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: might be really old topic, but please take a
look
briefly:
our choice was oracl
briefly:
our choice was oracle/NT, based mainly on division/corporate direction which
was based on the strengths of oracle. widely installed, industry leader,
robust platform.
NT was a no-brainer; the majority of our knowledge is NT. price and
complexity were considered also, even though you ha
Title: RE: might be really old topic, but please take a look
Oh, ha! that is an old one:
Oracle on Unix is the "only" choice.
No need to research at all! Just go out and buy one!
:)
Ross
p.s. give us more info, and you'll get a higher quality answer. GIGO
|
