Thanks Mike, I'll keep an eye out for it.
Lee
-Original Message-
Sent: 05 March 2002 15:29
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Lee,
Be aware of bug 2220597. I believe metalink identifies other 64bit OS's,
but I've experience it on Tru64 5.1 (1885). Not sure if there is a bug f
Lee,
Be aware of bug 2220597. I believe metalink identifies other 64bit OS's,
but I've experience it on Tru64 5.1 (1885). Not sure if there is a bug fix
available yet.
Mike Hand
Polaroid Corp
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:23 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACL
Whoops - Thanks Ray, time to get my eyes tested !
-Original Message-
Sent: 01 March 2002 18:59
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:23:24AM -0800, Robertson Lee - lerobe wrote:
> Anyone aware of 8.1.7.3 for Oracle on Tru64 ?? I haven't seen this
availa
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:23:24AM -0800, Robertson Lee - lerobe wrote:
> Anyone aware of 8.1.7.3 for Oracle on Tru64 ?? I haven't seen this available
> on OTN/Metalink and as we are upgrading our DBs at the moment I might as
> well go to that if its out there.
on metal-ink
ID:1337914 Patchset:
Anyone aware of 8.1.7.3 for Oracle on Tru64 ?? I haven't seen this available
on OTN/Metalink and as we are upgrading our DBs at the moment I might as
well go to that if its out there.
TIA
Lee
-Original Message-
Sent: 28 February 2002 17:19
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:33:29 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
What vendor, what product?
The vendor is InforMax, the product is called GenoMax.
Sharon
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.oraf
Be careful with the 8.1.7.3 patchset if you use the dbms_describe or
odbsidescribe functions as the output format has changed in them
between 8.1.7.2 and 8.1.7.3 and 9.0.1.1 and 9.0.1.2...
If you are not using this functionality, then there is not problem. If
you are using it, make sure you exerc
Thanks Bill. I will keep that in mind. Sometimes the vendor doesn't want
to spend time to help out and find this as the reason to do so.
Sharon
--On Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:32 AM -0500 bill thater
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am managing a soft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am managing a software that uses a set of 8 oracle databases. I am
> preparing to upgrade all my databases from 8.1.6.3.0 to 8.1.7.0.0 then
> apply a patch to the oracle software installation after the upgrade.
> The software that uses these databases are
That is a tough call, in my experience 8.1.7.3 is more stable and has fewer
minor patches than 8.1.7.2, I would certainly go for .3. However, the best
course of action is to call your vendor see if and when they will support
8.1.7.3. On the other hand if this database will only run the vendor's
a
Its surprising that a vendor goes down to the 4th
digit in terms of support/nosupport.
If its any help, we've been running 8.1.7.3 (solaris)
since the patch came out and have not encountered any
problems
hth
connor
--- "Xiaohong Yang (Sharon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > Hi,
>
> I am managin
What vendor, what product?
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,
I am managing a software that uses a set of 8 oracle databases. I am
preparing to upgrade all my databases from 8.1.6.3.0 to 8.1.7.0.0 then
apply a pat
12 matches
Mail list logo
