Title: RE: About parallel server
Several things:
You will have to re-license (your honest aren't you) for the faster machines and OPS;
Build the new database on raw and export/import. Maybe "dd" would get your datafiles from cooked ufs to raw but it's to much FUD for
Title: RE: About parallel server
Your point 1:
Unless things have changed redo and controlfiles must be raw. When I took the OPS course several years ago and worked with OPS we needed the redo/controlfiles to be on raw so that one instance could recover when another instance failed
Fernando, You will need cluster manager and shared disk
drives to build this cluster.
You need at least
Oracle 8.1.6 or 8.1.7
Solaris 2.6
Sun Cluster Manager 2.2
Some volume manager preferably Veritas 2.2.1+ or 3.0.4+
Solaris 8 (2.8)
Sun Cluster Manager 2.2 or 3.0 ( If you use SC 3.0 then
Title: RE: About parallel server
Dick,
What are you using for your source for this information?
This does not jibe with other things I have read.
If your not going to use a shared raw device for
the online redo logs, how can one instance to instance recovery
for another instance that
We have a couple of independent applications running over the same instance
now (it's better to do it because our resources cant' support two instances
over the same machine), we think if we use parallel server, we can make
"partition" of this applications, one for each node or someting like that
I have heard from iouga attendees that there was is something
called "Rack" from oracle/compaq on the horizon with 9i which
is the next replication solution. Can folks comment on this?
What is the architecture and how does this play with oracle?
Is this just an OPS on some alphastation? Our co
le recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: About parallel server
>Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:06:38 -0800
>
>Dick,
>
> What are you using for your source for this information?
>This does not jibe with other things I have read.
>If your not going to us
CTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: About parallel server
> >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:06:38 -0800
> >
> >Dick,
> >
> > What are you using for your source for t
ll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/31/01 11:36 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: About parallel server
I have heard from iouga atten
Ray, Oracle9i RAC (Real Application Clusters) is or was
(depending on your perspective) Oracle Parallel Server.
Compaq is working with Oracle to pre-install and ship
Oracle9i on there NT boxes (not sure about TRU64 or
OpenVMS platforms), so you just turn it on and it works.
Oracle9i replicati
Fernando, If your current resources are limited and the
app is partitioned, you should have very few problems
implementing the App in OPS (famous last words). If HA is
a requirement and fast failover times OPS is a good pick.
Just make sure the ends justify the means. Some people
have good e
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:17:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ray
> I think, you are referring to RAC, Real Application Cluster. Which
> is same as OPS with cache fusion for all scenarios. Please see my previous
> mail thread with the same subject..
--
index oracle-l
The ar
hat OPS on 9i will allow you to use cooked files.
>
> User group meeting next week, with a presentation on 9i new features.
> I'll ask
>
> Rachel
>
>
> >From: "Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>So whether you are using 7, 8, 8i, 9i you can use
> filesystems for OPS (RAC) if the OS supports multiple
> concurrent mounts on the same filesystem from multiple
> nodes.
Scott,
Thanks for answering a question I asked Oracle several
year
Jared,
We had tried OPS in a test environment on DG Aviion, we were told to go for
RAW file system by Oracle and DG (I believe).
HTH
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expres
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01/01 12:44PM >>>
On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>So whether you are using 7, 8, 8i, 9i you can use
> filesystems for OPS (RAC) if the OS supports multiple
> concurrent mounts on the same filesystem from multiple
> nodes.
Scott,
Thanks for ans
A couple of years ago, no vendor has a distributed file system (one that
will let all nodes in a cluster to mount and access the same file system
simultaneously).
And that's why we had to use raw device. Maybe DG had it? So which vendor
has it then and who has it now?
Richard Ji
>>> [EMAIL PR
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC) had functional VAX-Clusters
in the early 1980's and did NOT use raw devices. The
VAX-Clusters used the same filesystem as stand-alone
VAX systems used!
So Compaq has it today on their "legacy" VMS systems.
Richard Ji wrote:
>
> A couple of years ago, no vendor has
It was DG/UX on DG Aviion Systems, with Clariion
storage system. We were sharing filesystems between
2 nodes.
Don't know about the rest of DG, but EMC purchased
their Clariion storage system unit.
Jared
On Friday 01 June 2001 14:25, Richard Ji wrote:
> A couple of years ago, no vendor has
19 matches
Mail list logo
