Re: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread rgaffuri
id prefer to handle this in the database. From: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 10:29:33 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stupid dbms_job question It's called cron :). Or you could run a shell script that executes

Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Gudmundur Josepsson
I had an issue with dmbs_job where the jobs would become broken if I altered them. Have you checked if the job becomes broken after you change the interval? Gudmundur im trying to submit a job that runs every 5 minuts. Only way I can get the submit to work is as follows... variable jobno

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Gints Plivna
Just a shot in the dark Have you set initialization parameters in the init file? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Re: stupid dbms_job question id

Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Quintin, Richard
An interval of trunc(sysdate)+(trunc(to_char(sysdate,'s')/900)+1)*5/24/60 ought to give you every 5 minutes. Courtesy of Tom... On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 10:29, Gene Sais wrote: It's called cron :). Or you could run a shell script that executes then sleeps for 5 mins. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread rgaffuri
what initialization parameters? job_queue_processes is fine. From: Gints Plivna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 11:49:32 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question Just a shot in the dark Have you set

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Ryan, remove the trunc() from sysdate+1/96 trunc is removing your time part. or you should be using ROUND(SYSDATE+1/96,'MI') instead. Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in

RE: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Goulet, Dick
What is JOB_QUEUE_INTERVAL set to? If it's more than 5 minutes then what your seeing is what you get. Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:09 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L im trying to submit a job

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Gints Plivna
JOB_QUEUE_INTERVAL I think But I found that it is obsolete in Release 9.0.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question what

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Khedr, Waleed
: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 10:29:33 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stupid dbms_job question It's called cron :). Or you could run a shell script that executes then sleeps for 5 mins. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/03 10:09AM

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Cortese Joseph
to handle this in the database. From: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 10:29:33 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stupid dbms_job question It's called cron :). Or you could run a shell script that executes then sleeps for 5 mins

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Cortese Joseph
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stupid dbms_job question It's called cron :). Or you could run a shell script that executes then sleeps for 5 mins. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/03 10:09AM im trying to submit a job that runs every 5 minuts. Only way I can get the submit to work

RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question

2003-10-23 Thread Goulet, Dick
that it is obsolete in Release 9.0.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Re: stupid dbms_job question what initialization parameters? job_queue_processes is fine. From