SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread John Shaw
I am trying to update a small table from a remote table with sqlplus 9.2.0.2 . It seems to indicate that it has inserted 233 row into my local table - however that doesn't really happen. Am I suffering from a severe lack of caffine or is this really odd?   SQL> select count(*) from facility;

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread babu . nagarajan
s of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | cc: | | Subject: SQLplus question u

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Arup Nanda
is not the same as CREATE TABLE "facility". HTH. Arup From: "John Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SQLplus question unusual behavior Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:30

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread John Shaw
    |  |       Subject:  SQLplus question unusual behavior |  >---|I am trying to update a small table from a remote table wit

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread John Shaw
the use of upper(). Someone might have defined the table in lowercase using quotes.CREATE TABLE FACILITY is not the same as CREATE TABLE "facility".HTH.Arup>From: "John Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACL

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Chaim . Katz
have defined the table in lowercase using quotes. CREATE TABLE FACILITY is not the same as CREATE TABLE "facility". HTH. Arup >From: "John Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Arup Nanda
Chaim, It was posted by John Shaw. And the figures showed 0 (not null) in the original posting. Arup From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Vladimir Begun
John Shaw wrote: I am trying to update a small table from a remote table with sqlplus 9.2.0.2 . It seems to indicate that it has inserted 233 row into my local table - however that doesn't really happen. Am I suffering from a severe lack of caffine or is this really odd? SQL> select count(*) f

RE: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Sony kristanto
: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:19 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior > > Check if there are two taables named FACILTY in your database. > > As SYS, check > > SELECT OWNER, Object_name, Object_type > FROM D

RE: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-20 Thread Richard Ji
dictionary or your program documentation. Hope this helps. Rgrds, Sony > -Original Message- > From: Arup Nanda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:19 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior >

RE: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-21 Thread Harvey Neil
ILITY' -Original Message-From: John Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 20 January 2003 15:31To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: SQLplus question unusual behavior I am trying to update a small table from a remote table with sqlplus 9.2.0.2 . It seems to ind

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-21 Thread Arup Nanda
P:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:19 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > Subject: Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior > > > > Check if there are two taables named FACILTY in your database. > > > > As SYS, check &

RE: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-21 Thread John Shaw
as the table owner or a subordinate user?   Check in the USER / DBA_POLICIES view where the OBJECT_NAME='FACILITY' -Original Message-From: John Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 20 January 2003 15:31To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: SQLplus ques

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-21 Thread John Shaw
I bounced the databases and just like rebooting a pc (even though this db is on solaris) it started working - one of the mysteries of Oracle - Maybe it was really windy and it was having sympathy pains with the yacht.>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/20/03 08:44PM >>>John Shaw wrote:> I am trying to

Re: SQLplus question unusual behavior

2003-01-21 Thread Vladimir Begun
John Shaw wrote: I bounced the databases and just like rebooting a pc (even though this db is on solaris) it started working - one of the mysteries of Oracle - Maybe it was really windy and it was having sympathy pains with the yacht. Dunno, I think the policy was enabled, all myths and mysteri