Title: SharePlex Summary
First thanks to every one who responded both on the list and to my private email:
The consensus appeared to be:
1. SharePlex is overly expensive for the functionality delivered and
2. Oracle has caught up in 9i for much of the functionality
3. Some features
Actually, I suspect I will be able to do the testing myself before I get more back
from those guys.
Matthew Zito made a good point in another reply to this message saying that 32 bit
addresses had to be translated to 64 bit addresses because of architecture
requirements so you would still hav
.
Allan
-Original Message-From: Mladen Gogala
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:30
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
SharePlex Summary
No
penalty. HP-UX is 64-bit os running on a 64-bit chip. Why would 64 bits impose
any
ct. On the other hand, who will ever need more then 640K
RAM?
--Mladen GogalaOracle DBA
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nelson, AllanSent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:49
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Frankly, that does not sound logical to me, but I would be extremely
interested if there is any authenticity to the statement.
I would ask the individual who made the statement to provide the proof. I
can't stop envisioning this on the next myth list.
PST
Please respond to [EMAIL
Allan
As to your Shareplex comments, I'm in no position to support or refute
your conclusions. My admittedly brief experience with replication leads me
to the conclusion that there are no simple conclusions. If ever there was an
area where "your mileage may vary", this is it. Replication is a si
Title: SharePlex Summary
Allan,
We use HP-UX 11.o & 11i with 817 & 9i. No
difference that I've noticed. Actually 9i seems to perform
better.
Dick GouletSenior Oracle DBAOracle Certified 8i
DBA
-Original Message-From: Nelson, Allan
[mailto:[EMAIL P
Title: Message
Cool,
I'll give 9i a try on HPUX.
-Original Message-From: Goulet, Dick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:19
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
SharePlex Summary
Allan,
We use HP-UX 11.o &
p.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nelson, AllanSent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:44
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
SharePlex Summary
Yes
we are PA risc rather than Itanic. The analysis I heard was the 64
