Sigh, There are many answers to this question related
to the environment you will be deploying into. It
sounds like you are actually maintaining many
databases. Are all of them really 24x7 (i.e. less than
a minute of downtime per year) or can you schedule
maintenance in the future that will not af
I'd agree with Ian, because (at-least) on AIX, pre 9013 versions had smon
leak, clob leak problems.
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't r
Cherie,
I agree with Dick. As long as you have time to install 9.2 on your
development machine and assure yourself that it, at least, does not hurt
you, I would go with 9.2 now just to give yourself breathing room for the
next year or so.
If you stick with 9.0, you know that you will begin to f
The choice should be between 9.0.1.3 + patch 2121935 or 9.2. The patch is to fix a
serious, serious security problem with ANSI-style joins.If you feel the need to
go to 9i, I'd choose the latter. I don't think 9.2 has been out long enough.
Ian MacGregor
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Cherie,
First off, I had no plans to ever use 9.0 anywhere other than test to see
what was new. In your case your already on 9.0.1 and appear happy with that.
Given that you could deploy o 9.0.1 or upgrade to 9.2 now and hope for a longer
time before the next upgrade. Personally I'd make t
Cherie,
Before any upgrade I consider whether or no I really need it. For
mission critical application it would be wise to stick with what you have,
unless you have problems with it.
Now we have 9.0.1.2 in production and 9.1.3 in development and I don't
intend to move to 9.2 in nearest tim
We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA.
These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've
been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot
in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which
