Tim,
Oracle has even produced a "developer's release" of Oracle9.2 for Mac OS X, downloadable from OTN.
that was released in Sept 2002.
releases of 8.1.6 and 8.1.7 were supposed to be released for production usage, according to articles floated by Bob Shrimpi. Those never happened.
What do you
I doubt it too. I don¹t see MAC as a serious server, and it would probably
be a mistake for Apple to go in that direction...
However, I hope that Oracle releases a 10g ³developer¹s release² for OS X,
so I can keep up by having it on my laptop. What they did with 9.2 is just
fine with me...
on
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: This is just wrong
I live on a Mac laptop. I chose to do so because there are
only three
possible alternatives for laptop (or PC) users:
- Windows
- anti-Windows (i.e
. Really the only downside is the price
tag, beats all other desktop platforms in all other areas.
Sten
-Original Message-From: Paul Drake
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003
11:09 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Re: This is just
I can answer that, or at least try.
When you buy a Mac with OSX, you're getting a system that
is fairly complete, and is supported by the HW vendor.
In contrast, when you install RedHat, ( or any other linux )
for personal use, it can be a real pain in some respects.
For instance: I use
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 9:44:25 PM, Mladen Gogala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
MG Jonathan, you're a very smart guy and a very nice one as well but I cannot
MG make sense of this clarification of yours.
Hey, it's possible that my comments make no sense. I never
promise to make sensegrin.
MG
Jared Still scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
Linux on the desktop is still not for the average user, it's
for geeks only IMO, or those fortunate enough to have a
resident geek to maintain it. ( my family for instance )
and this is the reason my home laptop runs XP pro. i don't have
Actually, I am sorry to hear that. I hoped that you started moonlighting
as an Apple salesman and that every buyer of Cary's book will get a free G5.
It would be nice, don't you think?
On 11/05/2003 08:04:24 AM, Jonathan Gennick wrote:
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 9:44:25 PM, Mladen Gogala
Your right, take a visit at www.lindows.com.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Redhat recommending windoze for desktop.
I live on a Mac laptop. I chose to do so because there are only three
possible alternatives for laptop (or PC) users:
- Windows
- anti-Windows (i.e. Linux)
- the middle-ground (i.e. Mac)
The Mac is mature (20 years) and has applications, such as Microsoft Office,
Netscape, etc. I have no
Redhat recommending windoze for desktop.
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5101690.html
--
Joseph S Testa
Chief Technology Officer
Data Management Consulting
614-791-9000
It's all about the CACHE
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Joe Testa
INET: [EMAIL
See? I might have been onto something with that spoof.
On 2003.11.04 19:19, Joe Testa wrote:
Redhat recommending windoze for desktop.
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5101690.html
--
Joseph S Testa
Chief Technology Officer
Data Management Consulting
614-791-9000
It's all about the CACHE
--
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 7:19:25 PM, Joe Testa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
JT Redhat recommending windoze for desktop.
JT http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5101690.html
I find that assessment reasonable. It's no slam against
Linux, just a recognition that for perhaps the vast majority
of
Jonathan, you're a very smart guy and a very nice one as well but I cannot
make sense of this clarification of yours. Would you care to explain it a bit?
What confuses me is that you agree that one version of Unix (Linux) is not
appropriate for a home user, but then, in the same message,
14 matches
Mail list logo
