Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Miller, Jay
The other week a new production process was running much more slowly than anticipated. A file needed to be sent out by 6:00pm and at the rate the table was being populated it wouldn't complete until around 9:30pm. The production people and developers came to me for help and I saw that the SQL

Re: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Rachel Carmichael
it's possible that the index was small enough to stay cached in the SGA? From: Miller, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much? Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:31:28 -0800

RE: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Miller, Jay
was small enough to stay cached in the SGA? From: Miller, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much? Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:31:28 -0800 The other week a new production

RE: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
-L it's possible that the index was small enough to stay cached in the SGA? From: Miller, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much? Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:31:28 -0800

RE: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Miller, Jay
of list ORACLE-L it's possible that the index was small enough to stay cached in the SGA? From: Miller, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much? Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001

RE: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
, July 25, 2001 12:57 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L it's possible that the index was small enough to stay cached in the SGA? From: Miller, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tuning question - Why did

Re: Tuning question - Why did this index help so much?

2001-07-25 Thread Stephane Faroult
Miller, Jay wrote: The other week a new production process was running much more slowly than anticipated. A file needed to be sent out by 6:00pm and at the rate the table was being populated it wouldn't complete until around 9:30pm. The production people and developers came to me for help