i
Seldon or Zaphod Beeblebrox.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cary Millsap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Vey interesting article at MetaLink
>
>
> I've learned
2007 tires". To quote the good, old Satchmo: what a wonderful
world!
> -Original Message-
> From: Grabowy, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:39 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Verrrry interesting article at Met
I agree! Stick it to 'em. They do it to us all the time. Ruth
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:24 PM
> From Oracle's Terms of Use on Metalink...
>
> "Confidentiality
> ---
> Except for inf
pients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Vey interesting article at MetaLink
>
>
> I've learned that those two emotions are not mutually exclusive.
>
> If you name's not in Oracle's source code somewhere, then I'd suggest
> you write someone at Oracle a
>From Oracle's Terms of Use on Metalink...
"Confidentiality
---
Except for information in Web sites controlled by third parties that are
accessible via hyperlinks from the MetaLink Web site, the information
contained in the Materials is the confidential proprietary information of
Orac
day, October 10, 2002 3:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Vey interesting article at MetaLink
>
>
> I've learned that those two emotions are not mutually exclusive.
>
> If you name's not in Oracle's source code somewhere, then I'd
Dick,
the difference is that Oracle is a corporation that is making money on
someone else's work. they are quick to hammer the people we work for over
license issues and, in this case, use someone elses work as a part of their
software suite.
it's not right.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Pro
p [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Verrrry interesting article at MetaLink
>
>
> I've learned that those two emotions are not mutually exclusive.
>
> If you name'
Jared,
Yes, you should be both.
Well, this not a legal advise, just my personal view:
I would find a layer, who specialises in the intellectual property laws, sue Oracle
... and settle.
Add a clause to the header, which will allow for usage of your scripts the way you
mean it.
For all those
viduals in the galaxy, standing next to Hari
Seldon or Zaphod Beeblebrox.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cary Millsap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Verrrry interesting article
gt; Subject: Verrrry interesting article at MetaLink
>
> I found something rather interesting on MetaLink today.
>
> While doing a little research on UTL_FILE, I came across
> document # 1050919.6. This document deals with how to
> dump a table to an ascii file.
>
Jared,
Should you be irritated? I've had some of the things I published on the
list put out as gospel elsewhere with my name attached & it's been a real pain
in the ^^$. I don't know. I think I'd feel flattered and relieved that no one
knows where it came from.
Dick Goulet
__
Not interested in compensation. Just a litte irritated that
the only change to the script was to remove my name.
Jared
On Thursday 10 October 2002 04:08, Rachel Carmichael wrote:
> you put the code out in the world without a comment in it about copying
> is not allowed and you've made it free
Jared,
I think you have a case for at the very least getting credit for your work.
It's one thing for someone to see what you've done and use the functionality
like you did.
It's completely something else for someone to lift all the code verbatim
without even changing a comment. It just shows
At least they TOLD me that "if" I ever get our Unique configuration for
Apps to work they expect me to write thier documentation for them
April
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 10/10/2002 2:13 AM
Dear list,
I found something rather interesting on
you put the code out in the world without a comment in it about copying
is not allowed and you've made it free for the taking.
Compensation isn't likely. Credit is definitely due and should be
given.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jared,
> You should feel upset as well as flattered. In my view
Just tell them you'll happy with a small amount of
acknowledgement...say, a 4-node Tru64 cluster with 9.2
rac and a year's free support.
Cheers
Connor
--- Jared Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>
> Dear list,
>
> I found something rather interesting on MetaLink
> today.
>
> While doing a
Reminds me of a famous quote
'Copying from one author is plagiarism, and copying from multiple authors is
research'
:-)
Naveen
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Dear list,
I found something rather interesting on Me
Jared,
You should feel upset as well as flattered. In my view you have a strong
case against Oracle for some form of compensation, as a minimum you should
be credited in the article.
Whether you can win against a big corporation is another matter of course.
I and many others can confirm that the
I've learned that those two emotions are not mutually exclusive.
If you name's not in Oracle's source code somewhere, then I'd suggest
you write someone at Oracle a note. It's an easy problem for them to
solve.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
Upcoming events:
- Hots
Dear list,
I found something rather interesting on MetaLink today.
While doing a little research on UTL_FILE, I came across
document # 1050919.6. This document deals with how to
dump a table to an ascii file.
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=
21 matches
Mail list logo
