RE: adpatch question

2002-01-30 Thread hemantchitale
Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: CHITALE Hemant Krishnarao/IT/CHRT/ST Group)

RE: adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread hemantchitale
E Hemant Krishnarao/IT/CHRT/ST Group) Su

RE: adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread Bellows, Bambi
Title: RE: adpatch question Matt (and any others who are interested) -   My adpatch went fine after tinkering under the hood except for one place where Oracle created a table, populated it and blew away its max extents.  Amusing, but lame.  I can't speak for Oracle on this one, b

RE: adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130)
Title: RE: adpatch question If he's not interested, I am.  Please post a summary upon completion. Matt Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "That is the top of the calibration target, that is NOT in fact a monolith"   - NASA TV Commentator - 7/5/1997

RE: adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread Bellows, Bambi
M > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: adpatch question > > > > Hi Folks! > > I'm in the middle of an 11.5.5 upgrade. Now, if you've done > that type of > thing before, you know those suckers just run forever, and if > you leave it

RE: adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread John Kanagaraj
k on 'http://www.needhim.org' ** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my employer or clients ** > -Original Message- > From: Bellows, Bambi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:21 AM > To: Multiple recipients of

adpatch question

2002-01-29 Thread Bellows, Bambi
Hi Folks! I'm in the middle of an 11.5.5 upgrade. Now, if you've done that type of thing before, you know those suckers just run forever, and if you leave it running overnight, you generally come in the next day to find that things failed overnight. Well, that's where I was. I left this sucke