t; > running..
> >
> > there are no indexes on the tables
> >
> > > --
> > > From: Tim Gorman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:13 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-
is view once every second
Rahul
> --
> From: Jared Still[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 8:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rahul
> Subject: Re: can clustering help INSERTS ?
>
>
> *no* waits?
>
> How is this
I believe Kevin gave that presentation at OpenWorld -- either last year
or the year before. His paper is available for download on the TUSC
site, as he works for TUSC.
--- DENNIS WILLIAMS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Naveen -
>He provided figures, and they are on the handout that is somewhere
of the
> > > > insertion process, currently it takes around 9 hrs... the management
> > wants
> > > > to bring it
> > > > down to 5-6 hrs...again.. i OD NOT see any wait events while the
process
> > is
> > > > running..
> > > &
insertion process, currently it takes around 9 hrs... the management
> wants
> > > to bring it
> > > down to 5-6 hrs...again.. i OD NOT see any wait events while the process
> is
> > > running..
> > >
> > > there are no indexes on the tables
> >
Naveen -
He provided figures, and they are on the handout that is somewhere in my
office. Maybe I'll run across it someday, or even better, maybe he'll
publish his results. Here are a few more details that I posted to this list
earlier.
Kevin Loney (author of Oracle DBA Handbook) has performe
DENNIS WILLIAMS wrote:
>
> Stephane
>You mentioned "each additional index costs about 2.5 times the cost of
> inserting into a non-indexed table". I just wanted to point out that Kevin
> Loney has done some performance tests involving the number of indexes. I
> don't know if he has published t
it events while the process
is
> > running..
> >
> > there are no indexes on the tables
> >
> > > --
> > > From: Tim Gorman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:13 PM
ess is
> running..
>
> there are no indexes on the tables
>
> > --
> > From: Tim Gorman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:13 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of
:13 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: Re: can clustering help INSERTS ?
> >
> > Rahul,
> >
> > It does no good to speculate; let's work with facts...
> >
> > What wait-events are occurring in the sessions running the INSERTs?
> > From: Tim Gorman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:13 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: Re: can clustering help INSERTS ?
> >
> > Rahul,
> >
> > It does no
Dennis,
Did he publish any figures? I mean, it seems common-sense that adding the
first index will hurt but adding 11th index to a table won't hurt that much.
As stephane pointed out, cost of an index is 2.5 times more than the cost of
insert in a non-indexed table.
So assuming cost is 1, than
ables
> --
> From: Tim Gorman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:13 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: can clustering help INSERTS ?
>
> Rahul,
>
> I
Stephane
You mentioned "each additional index costs about 2.5 times the cost of
inserting into a non-indexed table". I just wanted to point out that Kevin
Loney has done some performance tests involving the number of indexes. I
don't know if he has published these anywhere. In a nutshell, the re
Rahul,
It does no good to speculate; let's work with facts...
What wait-events are occurring in the sessions running the INSERTs? If you
can locate the sessions in the V$SESSION view, then use the value in the
column SID to locate associated rows in the V$SESSION_EVENT view, sorting by
the cumu
Rahul wrote:
>
> List,
> i have two heavily inserted tables, the structures are same.
> currently these tables reside on separate disks, can i increase the
> performance
> of inserts if i create these tables in a cluster ? as a cluster would force
> the rows of both the tables
> to be physically c
List,
i have two heavily inserted tables, the structures are same.
currently these tables reside on separate disks, can i increase the
performance
of inserts if i create these tables in a cluster ? as a cluster would force
the rows of both the tables
to be physically close on the disk !
regards
17 matches
Mail list logo