RE: copyright

2003-02-12 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
w, as we all know there is a difference between rights and being able to defend those rights. If you have placed a copyright notice on your script, that enhances your claims and is a practical measure that makes other parties aware of your rights that they might otherwise unwittingly trespass.

Re: copyright

2003-02-11 Thread Tim Gorman
ame in the script, but I don't claim any legal right to force them to do so. Please notice the lack of the word "copyright" in the script. Removing my name from the script would simply be bad manners and irritating to me, nothing more... Jared had a copyright notice on the script?

RE: Re[2]: copyright

2003-02-11 Thread Stephen Lee
> > my reply would be "Have a ball!!" > "Dirty deeds. Done dirt cheap!" -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Stephen Lee INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing

Re[2]: copyright

2003-02-11 Thread dgoulet
with the first, you might be proud you were attributed in the second. Some basic facts, Jared wrote it, Jared owns the copyright. The fact that he makes it publically available is irrelevant. Oracle is using his work, without attribution in a paid service. (Metalink, from which the page is now un

Re: copyright

2003-02-11 Thread Dave Morgan
sion to copy the script, but accepted practise in the area is that attribution is enough). You will definitely be unhappy with the first, you might be proud you were attributed in the second. Some basic facts, Jared wrote it, Jared owns the copyright. The fact that he makes it publically ava

News: Technology and the corruption of copyright

2001-06-11 Thread Dave Morgan
Hi All, In light of the recent discussion here is an alternate view. http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2770541,00.html Dave -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Dave Morgan INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (8

Re: is a paper copyright

2001-06-08 Thread Greg Moore
Wrong! Apparently the third point I made about placing a paper into the public domain was wrong. It used to be that a person who published something freely in effect put the paper into the public domain and lost their copyright. But I just took a look at some sites describing copyright law

Re: is a paper copyright

2001-06-08 Thread Greg Moore
> If you write something, you are considered to own the > copyright to it. Right. Anything a person writes is protected by copyright law. Registering a copyright makes it easier to enforce. It's similar in a way to oral contracts. If we are talking and agree on a contract, i

re: is a paper copyright

2001-06-08 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Friday, June 08, 2001, 12:57:10 PM, you wrote: GT> I have a question on this topic. How do you know of a paper is copyrighted? If you write something, you are considered to own the copyright to it. So your basic assumption should always be that a given paper is copyright by somebody. That co