Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-21 Thread Tim Gorman
; 'Tim Gorman' Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:59 AM Subject: RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event Tim,   more specifically could large SQL have been passed across the net ?   Stored procedures could help here.   FWIW.   Mike

RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-21 Thread Johnson, Michael
thank you.   mike -Original Message-From: Anjo Kolk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:09 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event No,   this is "to client", so

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-21 Thread Anjo Kolk
ing it to the server. Parse once/execute many   Anjo. - Original Message - From: Johnson, Michael To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:10 PM Subject: RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event Tim,   mor

RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-21 Thread Johnson, Michael
: Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event Depending on the application, couldn't these large pauses be performance problems in the client program?  Not a server tuning issue nor a SQL*Net tuning issue at all?  For example, if the client program was pausing a long

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-21 Thread Suhen Pather
Monday, August 19, 2002 8:08 PM > Subject: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event > > > Hi, > > > > I am tuning a system at a client site and notice lots of waits for > SQL*Net <http://213.46.46.10/cgi-bin/yappweb206#SQL*Net more data to > client#SQL*

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-20 Thread Tim Gorman
?  Or would that just be accounted for under "SQL*Net message from client" events? - Original Message - From: Suhen Pather To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:08 PM Subject: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to cl

Re:RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-20 Thread dgoulet
The BEQ (or BEQueath) protocol adapter is only usable within the server, not outside and is actually the best to use when you can. TCP/IP is the most often used protocol outside of a server and in a client/server configuration. Setting TDU and SDU to something other than 2K (the default) can in

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-20 Thread Anjo Kolk
John, That event can happen for a couple of reasons, but the most common one is that the serverside has returned an error for the client side for an operation. The client side isn't really expecting it so the server sends a break/reset to the client. That gives the client a change to resync.

RE: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-20 Thread John Kanagaraj
Anjo, On a related topic: I always wanted to know what the 'SQL*Net break/reset to client' (or to dblink) means... There isn't much out there :( John Kanagaraj -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 2:13 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L SQL*Net ships data (in

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-20 Thread Anjo Kolk
ORACLE-L Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 4:08 AM Subject: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event Hi,   I am tuning a system at a client site and notice lots of waits for SQL*Net more data to client (97%) for a fraction of the CPU consumed by the system

Re: how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-19 Thread Jakob Hammer-Jakobsen
Suhen, I can't see the report your link is pointing at, but I guess that the "more-data-to-client" event is a big part of total waittime. Basically the event indicates, that the server is trying to send data to the client for a second, third time. Meaning that the it is sending consecutive

how to reduce SQL*Net more data to client wait event

2002-08-19 Thread Suhen Pather
Hi,   I am tuning a system at a client site and notice lots of waits for SQL*Net more data to client (97%) for a fraction of the CPU consumed by the system.   I know this is not to be characterized as an idle wait event and can yield better performance if we increase the packet size.