When you have already contacted oracle support, you could have asked
them. It's their job to know that.
On 01/21/2004 05:24:28 PM, AK wrote:
Looks like we are hitting bug 3091541 ( As per oracle support ) .
getting ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17281],
Looks like we are hitting bug 3091541 ( As per oracle support )
getting ksedmp: internal or fatal errorORA-00600: internal error code,
arguments: [17281], [1001], [2614232176], [], [], [], [], []ORA-01001:
invalid cursor
Does anybody have idea ( details of the bug . It's
on hp-ux 11.0 or
IIRC, the ORA-1555 was in another session.
Jared
"Henry Poras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/06/2003 08:53 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
Interesting bug. I'm spacing on one thing though. Don't see where the
ORA-1555 is coming from on their test case.
Henry
***EXCERPT FROM BUG REPORT
***
***
REM Create the user and the tables in question
REM
create user medic identified by medic;
alter user medic default tablespace users temporary
Wait... I thought it was 9i that did away with the need for DBAs...
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
No worries. The bug says it's fixed in 10.0. Just upgrade. Anyone can do
it, since 10.0 removes the need for a DBA.
No worries. The bug says it's fixed in 10.0. Just upgrade. Anyone can do
it, since 10.0 removes the need for a DBA.
Whoa. Gotta cut back on the black tea here...
Rich
Rich JesseSystem/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex,
Title: RE: Oracle Bug Reports...
Thanks Jared for bringing this to our attention.. So many bugs .. how can we track 'em all?
Raj
-
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at espn dot com
Any views expressed here are strictly personal.
QOTD
... can be rather interesting at times, when there's time to check out a
few.
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showDoc?db=BUG&id=2666174
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
s personal and doesn't reflect that of
> ESPN Inc.
> QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: Multiple recipi
Title: RE: Oracle bug 2316137
If you have cursor_sharing=force ... can you use cursor_sharing=exact and see if the error reproduces? I think (and I could be wrong) that this setting will at-least buy you some time.
Search for 'kksscl-inf-inl-loop' including bug database, you&#x
Title: RE: Oracle bug 2316137
You could always install oracle in another oracle home, Patch that home
Then all you need is 1 min down time to shutdown the db and bring it up with the other patched oracle.
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
We've just started experiencing a problem where a client-server Forms
4.5 application hangs and then produces this error:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kksscl-inf-inl-loop],
[1500], [0], [1], [41], [41], [], []
Our database is version 9.2 and we found reference to a bug on metalink,
gt; Subject: Re: Oracle Bug #1311597
>
> Ethan,
>
> This is not an Oracle bug, but an AIX bug. The Oracle
> patch for this bug was merely a workaround until IBM
> released an APAR with the fix.
>
> You need the fix for IBM's lio_listio() problem (APAR
> IY15138). Th
Ethan,
This is not an Oracle bug, but an AIX bug. The Oracle
patch for this bug was merely a workaround until IBM
released an APAR with the fix.
You need the fix for IBM's lio_listio() problem (APAR
IY15138). The fix is part of collective fix PTF
U473812 (there may be a newer APAR out
I have run into this one on an 8.1.6 database AIX 4.3.3. I know there is an
AIX patch but I am not the admin and may need a quicker solution to get
async io back up. Anyone know if this still exist on 8.1.7.x for AIX
4.3.3.0?
Thanks,
Ethan
http://www.geocities.com/epost1
---
short trip.LOLOL!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/04/01 04:17PM >>>
This one is a good one:
8.1.7 on aix and linux for sure.
create table x(x number);
create synonym y for x;
truncate table y;
ORA-4020 DEADLOCK DETECTED
on 8.1.6
you get the correct message:
942-table or view not found.
Bug #157
This one is a good one:
8.1.7 on aix and linux for sure.
create table x(x number);
create synonym y for x;
truncate table y;
ORA-4020 DEADLOCK DETECTED
on 8.1.6
you get the correct message:
942-table or view not found.
Bug #1579190
Drove me nuts for a while :)
Joe
Get your FREE downl
I should have told the actual problem , any how here I go with it ..
create table test (col1 double precision, col2 double precision);
Table created.
create view test_view (col1, col2, col3) as select col1 , col2 , col1+col2 from test;
View created.
desc test_view;
Name
I am uncertain why you believe this to be a problem. Its using the default
number size (38 I think) but it's not really storing it anywhere, it's just
keeping the definition, so what do you care how big it thinks it is? Its
plenty large enough to handle any sum of to number(20)s.
At 08:31 AM
I have table which has two cols in it like below:
create table test (col1 number(20), col2 number(20));
Table created.
Now, I have a situation where I need to create a view on this
table with three columns and third column is sum of first and second
columns.
create view test_view (col1, col2, co
20 matches
Mail list logo
