Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Babu . Nagarajan
nen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL) Sent by: Subject: order by in subquery workaround [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11-07-2002 19:38 Please respond to ORACLE-L > Solaris 2.6 > O

RE: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Baker, Barbara
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > agency.com> > > cc: (bcc: Jack van > > Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL)

Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Robert Pegram
.com> > cc: (bcc: Jack van > Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL) > > Sent by: > Subject: order by in subquer

Re: order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-12 Thread Jack van Zanen
ternal/MEY/NL) Sent by: Subject: order by in subquery workaround [EM

order by in subquery workaround

2002-07-11 Thread Baker, Barbara
> Solaris 2.6 > Oracle RDBMS v8.0.5.2.1 > List: I'm trying to run a retrofit of statspack on an 8.0.5 database. (ya, I know. upgrading would actually be easier) The statspack stuff came from an 8.1.7 install I have on the same box. The spreport.sql report encounters errors in the "orde