Chris,
I've worked on a large Powerbuilder App for a number of years. We used CBO all
the time under 7.3.2, 7.3.4 and 8.1.7. You're right Powerbuilder per se
requiring RBO is rubbish.
Cheers,
Chris Dunscombe
Quoting Chris Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm working with a 3rd party vendor
On 01/15/2004 09:54:36 AM, Chris Stephens wrote:
> There response was that it's a limitation of powerbuilder. I don't buy that
> for a second. ...anyone know for sure?
I have slight experience with supporting Powerbuilder apps in 1996 and,
later, in 1998. At that time it was completely possibl
Powerbuilder is a GUI. just like forms. This is what typically happens with
3rd party apps. They develop them some time in the past. Oracle adds new
features, they dont want to spend the money to test to see if it works. So
they tell customers not to use them. Its how they keep costs down. New
deve
try again...
-Original Message-
Chris
I know from a previous assignment that PowerBuilder has no issues running
queries against a database using the CBO. In fact, PowerBuilder doesn't give
a rats backside what the database does to the query as long as it returns
what's expected.
As for "
Chris
I know from a previous assignment that PowerBuilder has no issues running
queries against a database using the CBO. In fact, PowerBuilder doesn't give
a rats backside what the database does to the query as long as it returns
what's expected.
As for "redundant" constraints, they will increas
I'm working with a 3rd party vendor to resolve some performance issues with
there call center app. The app is written in PowerBuilder. When I traced
the offending sessions, I noticed the queries are being run under the rbo.
When I run those same queries under the cbo the response time is
dramatic
