indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have
to say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason
for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto
om:
Arup
Nanda
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:08
PM
Subject: Re: Rebuilding Indexes...
Jared,
Did you attach the scripts?
I use the index rebuildingregularly for
certain applications where buffer busy waitsare prevalent.
--- Jared Still [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Though I have published a script for
determining indexes
that
need to be rebuilt, and then
rebuilding them, I have to
say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About
published a script for
determining indexes
that
need to be rebuilt, and then
rebuilding them, I have to
say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About
the only reason
for
ever
doing so
ORACLE-L
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 1:33
PM
Subject: Re: Rebuilding Indexes...
Arup,
Excellent practice! I have
writtenmuch the same scripts, except I use them as an extension to
STATSPACK and named the resulting persistenttable
CSTATS$INDEX_STATS. Nevertheless
that
need to be rebuilt, and then
rebuilding them, I have to
say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About
the only reason
for
ever
=== message truncated
-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 10:13 PM
Though I have published a script for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes
Connor
Connor McDonald wrote:
I'm a little doubtful about the value of 'keep index'.
Consider the scenarios:
unique constraint, non-unique index:
- keep index redundant because its kept anyway
unique constraint, unique index:
- keep index redundant because effectively retains
the constraint
that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild
a script for determining indexes
that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to
say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason
for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto
for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto
RACLE-L"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 10:13
PM
Subject: Re: Rebuilding
Indexes...
Though I have published a script for determining indexes
that need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say
that this is almost never necessary. Why are you
rebuildi
that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to
say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason
for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search
have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently, the third article may be of interest.
Jared
On Thursday 26 December
: Rebuilding Indexes...
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently, the third article may be of interest
Title: Rebuilding Indexes...
Thanks
for the responses from all the great minds on this list! :)
-Original Message-From: Richard Huntley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002
3:24 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Rebuilding Indexes...
Anyone
and on occasion sqlloads (via direct path) duplicate rows
Rachel
--- Jared Still [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I have published a script for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding
that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently
direct path) duplicate rows
Rachel
--- Jared Still [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I have published a script for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason
PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I have published a script for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5
To: Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wisernet100@y cc:
ahoo.comSubject: Re: Rebuilding
Indexes... Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
12/27/2002
07:43
for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild
to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say
that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently, the third
Subject: Re:
Rebuilding
Indexes... Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
12/27/2002
07:43 AM
Please respond
to ORACLE-L
Here's a reason:
have you
:
ahoo.comSubject: Re: Rebuilding
Indexes...
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for
ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently, the third article may be of interest.
Jared
On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:24
indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild
, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do a search on 'index rebuild'.
Currently, the third article may be of interest.
Jared
Title: Rebuilding Indexes...
Anyone have any useful scripts for doing this?
TIA,
Rich
Rich,
select 'alter index '||owner||'.'||index_name||' rebuild;' from
sys.dba_indexes where owner = 'PUTOWNERNAMEHERE';
is a good start for normal non-bitmap indexes, enhance it to do bitmap,
etc. :)
joe
Richard Huntley wrote:
Anyone have any useful scripts for doing this?
TIA,
Rich
--
Title: Rebuilding Indexes...
Here is the index
rebuilding part of a ksh script I use. Prior to this, I some variable
setting, check the existence and permissions on some files, check the existence
of tablespaces, check that the script is not already running, etc. In this
script, all
Title: Rebuilding Indexes...
Script "gen_rebuild_idx.sql" on www.evdbt.com/tools.htmgenerates
SQL to rebuildUNUSABLE indexes, index partitions/subpartitions. You
can modify the WHERE clauses as you prefer...
- Original Message -
From:
Richard Huntley
To
Though I have published a script for determining indexes that
need to be rebuilt, and then rebuilding them, I have to say that
this is almost never necessary.
Why are you rebuilding indexes? About the only reason for ever
doing so is that the BLEVEL = 5.
goto asktom.oracle.com, and do
Title: rebuilding indexes
Under what conditions would an 'alter index .. rebuild'
actually case the size of the index to increase
by about 12 percent?
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contrary to popular opinion, Unix is user friendly.
It's just particular about who
storage parameter difference? are you moving from one tablespace to
another without specifying parameters?
pctfree/pctused influence?
--- Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Under what conditions would an 'alter index .. rebuild'
actually case the size of the index
Title: RE: rebuilding indexes
storage parameter difference? None
are you moving from one tablespace to
another without specifying parameters? No
pctfree/pctused influence? none
I should have put this in the original message.
Indexes stayed in original tablespace with identical
Matt,
1) Storage parameter changes? Do you specify storage
at the index or tablespace (or top partition)
level?pctfree go up? initrans go up? bigger INITIAL or
NEXT?
2) did you build it the first time using parallelism
and rebuild using single thread? When a PQ processes
is used to build an
with.
-Original Message- From: Rachel
Carmichael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:49 PM To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re:
rebuilding indexes
storage parameter difference? are you moving from one
tablespace to another without specifying
parameters?
pctfree
I'm sure it's #6 :)
--- Jack Silvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
1) Storage parameter changes? Do you specify storage
at the index or tablespace (or top partition)
level?pctfree go up? initrans go up? bigger INITIAL or
NEXT?
2) did you build it the first time using parallelism
and
then the only thing I can think of is that there was heavy activity on
the index prior to the rebuild and the blocks filled and the rebuild
evened it out.
--- Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
storage parameter difference? None
are you moving from one
Lose 20 blocks in 10 days! Load as much as you
normally do and still lose index width.
no segment size restrictions or tiring delete routines
that never seem to finish. easy-to-follow
substr(column,1,1) update routine that guarentees a
maximum of data loss and a minimum of storage!
email to
it's definitely friday :)
--- Jack Silvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lose 20 blocks in 10 days! Load as much as you
normally do and still lose index width.
no segment size restrictions or tiring delete routines
that never seem to finish. easy-to-follow
substr(column,1,1) update routine
Mathew,
There has to be something that changed in the index or the storage
parameters. The index storage is basically based on the database block
size, the pctfree, the average length of the index entry, and the number
of rows in the index. If you changed none of these the index should
remain
Matt,
What sort of indexes are these? What is the DML pattern that affect these
indexes? Answers to these questions may give us a clue why this is occuring.
John Kanagaraj
Oracle Applications DBA
DBSoft Inc
(W): 408-970-7002
The manuals for Oracle are here: http://tahiti.oracle.com
The manual
Title: RE: Rebuilding Indexes Question
I
remember reading somewhere that alter index ... rebuild analyzes index with
estimate default. In case this is not desirable one need to reanalyze an index
after rebuilding.
Alex
Hillman
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Title: RE: Rebuilding Indexes Question
I think, rebuilding indexes may use the existing index to build, so that the performancce will improve comparitively doind drop and create indexes...
Nirmal.,
-Original Message-
From: Alex Hillman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October
I agree.
If you're really tight on space, you may need to
consider drop/create, otherwise rebuilds generally are
the way to go.
hth
connor
--- Jacques Kilchoer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
What are the
Title: RE: Rebuilding Indexes Question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
What are the advantages/disadvantages to doing a alter index rebuild
(Oracle 8.0.X) versus dropping and recreating the index.
My personal opinion - if your database
Jacques
i think oracle puts exclusive locks on the table on
which you are trying to create an index. that reason
should be good enough to use the rebuild online
option instead of create/drop especially for systems
that require to be available all the time
Deepak
--- Jacques Kilchoer [EMAIL
From 1st hand experience, folks need to be warned that
the last time I did this during normal working hours on an
index on a production table, the order entry department
could no longer commit new orders. They were hung
until the index rebuild completed. So use with caution.
Deepak Thapliyal
and in 9i, almost everything is done online, w/journaling and no
locking.
but thats another week in the future. ;)
joe
Charlie Mengler wrote:
From 1st hand experience, folks need to be warned that
the last time I did this during normal working hours on an
index on a production table, the
Title: RE: Rebuilding Indexes Question
re-building online was carried out for one of our huge indexes. It took lots of resouces and slowed down the system performance. The operation had to be cancelled. Though users can still carry out transactions against the concerned table, Oracle uses
]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Scripts for Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
First off, checking on a regular basis for indexes that need
rebuilding is
fine, but don't rebuild all of them every night. Not only
Does anyone have any good scripts for rebuilding indexes nightly on
Solaris UNIX that theyd be willing to share? Also, in your experience is it better to run this through
UNIX cron jobs than using the Oracle OEM job scheduler? I suspect the cron job will be the
favorable answer
Nightly? That is a lot. Are you really entering that much
data on a daily basis?
-Original Message-From: David Wagoner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06,
2001 8:57 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: Scripts for Rebuilding Indexes
have any good scripts for rebuilding indexes nightly on
Solaris
UNIX that they'd be willing to share? Also, in your experience is it
better
to run this through UNIX cron jobs than using the Oracle OEM job
scheduler?
I suspect the cron job will be the favorable answer.
Thanks in advance
?
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:57 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Does anyone have any good scripts for rebuilding indexes nightly on Solaris
UNIX that they'd be willing to share? Also, in your experience is it better
to run this through UNIX cron jobs than using
for
Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jitsu.com cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: Scripts
for Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED
] To: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jitsu.com cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: Scripts
for Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/06/2001 11
PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jitsu.com cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: Scripts
for Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED
(GEAE, Compaq) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Scripts for Rebuilding Indexes Nightly on Solaris
First off, checking on a regular basis for indexes that need
rebuilding is
fine, but don't rebuild all of them
PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bumoer Stickers [RE: Rebuilding indexes]
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:32:25 -0800
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Kevin Kostyszyn wrote:
What does RTFM mean?
Beautiful. That's our bumper sticker.
--
Jeremiah Wilton
http
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hatzistavrou Giannis wrote:
I don;t quite understand you quoting
Once
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001,Rachel Carmichael scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
-THAT one I'll put on my car :)
-
-and my desk. and the developer's face
OK so who's geting them printed?;-) or should i look into it?
--
Bill Shrek Thater Certifiable ORACLE DBA
Telergy, Inc.[EMAIL
what was the date of this cartoon??
At 01:25 PM 6/1/01 -0800, Post, Ethan wrote:
This is getting stupid, sorry I'm going to contribute to this...how about
Calvin (http://www.ucomics.com/calvinandhobbes/viewch.htm) peeing on a SQL
Server Logo, sure beats him peeing on a Ford sign.
- Ethan Post
tzistavrou Yannis
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 22:15
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
No need to copy the whole file to the standby when adding a datafile!
/~jwilton
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 22:15
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Rebuilding indexes
No need to copy the whole file to the standby when adding a datafile!
Just wait
Jeremiah Wilton wrote:
Vadim Gorbounov mentioned the column 'unrecoverable_change#' in v$datafile.
This looks like an SCN, not a count of unrecoverable changes. Either way, it
seems like a useful way to decide if a datafile shoule be refreshed onto the
standby. I can even imagine
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hatzistavrou Giannis wrote:
I don;t quite understand you quoting
Once the indexes have all
been rebuilt nologging
I bow to the uber geek :)
but putting either of those bumper stickers on my car in NY could get me
seriously hurt!
From: Jeremiah Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Fri, 01 Jun
AN IDIOT?
or
SHUTDOWN ABORT
Don't forget HELP
- Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hatzistavrou Giannis wrote:
I don;t quite understand you
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hatzistavrou Giannis wrote:
I don;t quite understand you quoting
Once the indexes have all
been rebuilt nologging
This is getting stupid, sorry I'm going to contribute to this...how about
Calvin (http://www.ucomics.com/calvinandhobbes/viewch.htm) peeing on a SQL
Server Logo, sure beats him peeing on a Ford sign.
- Ethan Post
--
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Kevin Kostyszyn wrote:
What does RTFM mean?
Beautiful. That's our bumper sticker.
--
Jeremiah Wilton
http://www.speakeasy.net/~jwilton
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jeremiah Wilton
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network
had:
ARE YOU AN IDIOT?
or
SHUTDOWN ABORT
Don't forget HELP
- Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1
Stickers [RE: Rebuilding indexes]
is that supposed to be printed with really small, or really big font?
'IF YOU CAN READ THIS, YOU ARE A CERTIFIED PIG FUNDAMENT'
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services
?
or
SHUTDOWN ABORT
Don't forget HELP
- Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Wilton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hatzistavrou Giannis wrote:
I don;t
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 01:32:25PM -0800, Jeremiah Wilton wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Kevin Kostyszyn wrote:
What does RTFM mean?
Beautiful. That's our bumper sticker.
yep, well done!
===
Ray Stell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540)
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Bumoer Stickers [RE: Rebuilding indexes]
This is getting stupid, sorry I'm going to contribute to this...how about
Calvin (http://www.ucomics.com/calvinandhobbes/viewch.htm) peeing on a SQL
Server Logo, sure beats him peeing on a Ford sign.
- Ethan Post
Here is the log from a guy last week on LazyDBA, I sent him about 3 emails
asking if he had even bothered to open the manual and never got a response,
check out his final post...
May 16...
How would I upgrade an Oracle 7.3.4 database to an
Oracle 8.1.6 database. I'm new to oracle and I don't
THAT one I'll put on my car :)
and my desk. and the developer's face
From: Jeremiah Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bumoer Stickers [RE: Rebuilding indexes]
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:32:25 -0800
For those of you that have implemented a standby database, what method do
you use to rebuild your indexes tablespace.
My plan was to create a new tablespace and rebuild the indexes into the new
tablespace and then reverse the process to move
back to the original tablespace after I drop and
: Richard Huntley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2001 15:01
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Rebuilding indexes
For those of you that have implemented a standby database,
what method do
name to the standby
control file.
There is also a detailed example on how to do it
-Original Message-
From: Richard Huntley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 16:01
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Rebuilding indexes
For those of you
there IS no way to do that with a standby database. Once you open it for
anything other than read-only (8i) you invalidate the standby status.
From: Richard Huntley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rebuilding
Adding a datafile does not cancel recovery - you just
need to 'pause' it, transport the appropriate files to
the standby and resume standby operations.
hth
connor
--- Richard Huntley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you that have implemented a standby
database, what method do
you use to
it for
anything other than read-only (8i) you invalidate the standby status.
From: Richard Huntley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:00:56 -0800
For those of you that have
, automatically adds the datafile name to the standby
control file.
There is also a detailed example on how to do it
-Original Message-
From: Richard Huntley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 16:01
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Rebuilding
they should be, unless you do nologging operations -- which can mess up your
standby database
From: The Oracle DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:05:57 -0800
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:00:56 -0800
For those of you that have implemented a standby database, what method do
you use to rebuild your indexes tablespace.
My plan was to create a new
No need to copy the whole file to the standby when adding a datafile! Just wait
for recovery to fail on the new file (ORA-01670), then type on the standby (in
'mount standby database' mode):
SQL alter database create datafile 'filename' as 'filename';
As long as you are using identical paths
On Thu, 31 May 2001,Rachel Carmichael scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
-It adds the datafile NAME only, not the file itself. And if the physical
-file has not been moved before the archived log that has that redo in it is
-applied, the recovery dies.
so if you got the file in the right
: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:15:25 -0800
No need to copy the whole file to the standby when adding a datafile! Just
wait
for recovery to fail on the new file (ORA-01670), then type on the standby
(in
'mount standby database' mode):
SQL alter database create datafile 'filename
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:00:56 -0800
For those of you that have implemented a standby database, what method do
you use to rebuild your indexes tablespace.
My plan
Hi Friends
I have 20Gb Table with 3 indexes each 3,6,6Gb size. Recenly we deleted some
2 yrs data from it. So I want to rebuild the Indexes..Iam planning add some
datafiles to it and just rebuild it, so that the new and old indexes fits
easily. Is there any better way???
Thanks
Raghu
yup -- that's what I used to try to do
From: Thater, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rebuilding indexes
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:09:37 -0800
On Thu, 31 May 2001,Rachel Carmichael scribbled
101 - 199 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
