no , i do not .
Thanks
DBAndrey
* 03-9254520
* 058-548133
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tue, May 28, 2002 4:53 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hello Andrey,
Do you use autonomous transaction?
Monday, May 27, 2002, 7:53:19 PM, you wrote:
AB
How about DML before (ie before your query starts)?
If there are massive amount of blocks to be cleaned
out, this can lead to ora-1555
hth
connor
--- Andrey Bronfin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant , no one runs a DML against those tables
during the running of the
program.
DBAndrey
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Nirmal Kumar Muthu Kumaran wrote:
Increase rollback segment size for this transaction and make sure
that the transaction will use the huge rollback segment
I don't think that solution is correct. This is a common
misconception about snapshot too old. Assigning your
I meant , no one runs a DML against those tables during
the running of the program.
Right. If there is no DML while your program is running, then the snapshot
error is due to DML that was run earlier. The solution is simple.
In the programs that do large batch inserts or updates on these
Dear list !
There is something strange going on in my production DB.
There is a program that reads fom 2 huge tables (A and B - select only) and
writes a fraction of records into some third table (let's call it C -
inserts only).
Now , NO ONE carries a DML agains A or B .
But occasionally i get
Title: RE: snapshot too old error - strange
Increase rollback segment size for this transaction and make sure that the
transaction will use the huge rollback segment
hth
nirmal
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Bronfin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon, May 27, 2002 15:53
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: snapshot too old error - strange
Dear list !
There is something strange going on in my production DB.
There is a program that reads fom 2 huge tables (A and B - select only)
and
writes a fraction of records into some third table (let's call
Onderwerp: snapshot too old error - strange
Dear list !
There is something strange going on in my production DB.
There is a program that reads fom 2 huge tables (A and B - select only)
and
writes a fraction of records into some third table (let's call it C -
inserts only).
Now , NO ONE carries a DML
-01555 messages (followed by a ORA-22924), on tables
with LOBs ...
HTH, Remco
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Andrey Bronfin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: maandag 27 mei 2002 14:53
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: snapshot too old error - strange
Dear list
2 huge tables A and B
Now , NO ONE carries a DML agains A or B.
If no one ever does DML against those two tables, how did they end up having
so many rows?
Do you run large batch update or insert operations against these tables from
time to time?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
Greg Moore wrote:
2 huge tables A and B
Now , NO ONE carries a DML agains A or B.
If no one ever does DML against those two tables, how did they end up having
so many rows?
Do you run large batch update or insert operations against these tables from
time to time?
One additional
11 matches
Mail list logo