Re: [OGD] Slow environmental change?

2006-04-28 Thread PainterArt
Cynthia wrote: "Well, some of you that responded to my email about change causing speciation have seemed to imply that in the past change has been gradual, much more gradual than our current 'global warming' that we are debating if it really exists." Actually none of the responses I have read

[OGD] Change and evolution

2006-04-28 Thread e.muehlbauer
Yes, a change in environment does lead to evolution, as species adapt to those changes...incrementally, as those most suited to the changes evolve. Now ...as to the speed of these incremental changes...when evolution occurs, it occurs very rapidly..in geologic time. In other words, while a

[OGD] Orchids, numbers and threats

2006-04-28 Thread Alan W Stephenson
A quick look at the federal list of Australian threatened species would reveal six extinct species, 24 critically endangered, 82 endangered and 71 vulnerable. Those classed under similar state legislation would increase those numbers significantly. However, despite all the best legislation a

Re: [OGD] roots question

2006-04-28 Thread K Barrett
Well, now. Let's not paint Old Man Holttum black yet. I've received the article in question (Thank you, icones) and its not as bad as you all think it is. So no stone tossing! Indeed, on going back through old OLDs OGDs and (dare I say it) ODOs much (if not all) of what Old Man Holttum says

[OGD] Whilst on the subject of roots: Haiku!

2006-04-28 Thread K Barrett
While noodling around past editions of this and other lists I found Nord's Haiku. I think they are worth repeating! Hope you agree. K Barrett N Calif, USA Haiku for a Phal Hohoemi x Joseph Hampton x Taisuco Kaaladian Mother's Day white phal marked down, 3 bucks at Sam's Club problem lurks un

Re: [OGD] orchid roots

2006-04-28 Thread Rforchids
re "vandas in situ"... if our gardens here are an acceptable substitute, c'mon down to Homestead and visit us. We have all kinds of epiphytic orchids (species and hybrids) in the trees on the property, including vandas and other vandaceous genera, cattleyas, dendrobiums, oncidiums, grammatophyllums

Re: [OGD] Orchid Roots

2006-04-28 Thread Stephen Manza
The Holtumm article is available here for anyone interested (2.5 Mb): http://www.slipperorchids.info/holttum1960.pdf The most recent article I can think of providing tons of info on orchid roots is: Pridgeon, A.M. "The Velamen and Exodermis of Orchid Roots." In Orchid Biology, Reviews and Perspec

[OGD] e-AOS Awards Program

2006-04-28 Thread Robert Hoffman
I will try this question again. Has anyone used the e-AOS Awards Program? It appears to be an improvement on the Wildcatt database program since it includes photos. Bob Hoffman Huntington Beach Orchids ___ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) orchids@orch

[OGD] Slow environmental change?

2006-04-28 Thread Schnitz
Well, some of you that responded to my email about change causing speciation have seemed to imply that in the past change has been gradual, much more gradual than our current 'global warming' that we are debating if it really exists.  I am sure that if plants had feelings, they would be very

Re: [OGD] roots question

2006-04-28 Thread Blue Moon Exotics
Jeez I guess I shoulda' read Holttum before growing my Vandas and related bare root. Lucky for me my plants can't read or they may have died years ago Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K Barrett Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:37 AM To:

[OGD] Holttum.

2006-04-28 Thread Andy Easton
Title: Holttum. Kathy, at least he could get published in the Bulletin at a time when there was a lot more pressure on space for articles than there is now! I knew him when he was very much in his dotage (he lived to 95) but he had little practical knowledge of orchid culture. His physiology

Re: [OGD] roots question

2006-04-28 Thread K Barrett
Yeah, that was my first thought, too. But then I've never seen vandas growing in situ. And you know how accomodating orchids are to culture. Holttum wrote 4-5 articles on Sarcanths in the AOS Bulletin, so I assume he was well known/respected in the orchid world at the time. K Barrett N Cali

Re: [OGD] Root Question

2006-04-28 Thread Mrosim
Interesting! But, if we have to believe in this, then what to say about Vandas with their roots hanging in the air, the same occuring with countless of other thin rooted orchids like Rodriguezias, many Oncidiums and so on? RosimV I V A X ___

[OGD] Environmental change

2006-04-28 Thread jerry bolce
> Not only are the "native" flora affected by > these changes, but so to are the fauna that depend on the planet. And to be noted that humans are part of the fauna. With overpopulation and abuse of the resources of the planet, humans could easily destroy their support system and themselves. Th

Re: [OGD] roots question

2006-04-28 Thread K Barrett
Stephen! You da man! 5><5 (<-- that's a high five) The AOS Bulletin has several articles by Mr Holttum, however not that one. There's nothing in the ODC, either. Can anyone please scan the article and send it to me? (Please please) Any plant biologists still reading this group? Does anyone

Re: [OGD] Orchid Books

2006-04-28 Thread IrisCohen
In a message dated 4/28/06 6:02:04 AM, Lee Bredeson writes: Perhaps you can recommend a better guide for growing orchids? I am no authority, but I haven't found anything to replace Rebecca Northen's Home Orchid Growing. I stopped reading the Ortho book when I got to the horrifying photo which incl

[OGD] Throw away Phals etc.

2006-04-28 Thread Andy Easton
Title: Throw away Phals etc. I fail to see where the fuss is centered. If you buy a Phalaenopsis in bloom and place it in your home or office away from an outside light source and fail to water it, the plant will last in beautiful bloom for at least a month. The buyer is still getting at leas

[OGD] Evolution and the pace of change

2006-04-28 Thread John Stanley
Guido makes a very useful point; whatever it is that causes changes in 'our time', they are very rapid by 'usual' geological rates. The rate at which species are becoming extinct is considered by some to be about the same as at the famous K/T (Cretaceous / Tertiary) mass extinction of 65 mil