Peter,
I'm sorry. I can't answer for the third world countries and how they can or
cannot do things. Apparently, though, CITES is so f_ed up they didn't
consider that either. Most of what is expected is what can be expected to be
available in developed countries. Thank you for pointing
In response to your questions:
"1) How do you propose that the CITES guys differentiate between plants that
have really been salvaged and plants that have suffered "gratuitous salvage" ?"
CITES has a fairly straight-forward definition of "salvage." If this is
followed, there is no problem, exc
Recently, a requested CITES permit for salvaged plants was refused by the
Canadian CITES office because "we cannot allow you to profit from a plant that
was once wild." Apparently, the Canadian CITES Administration is as arragent
and stupid as those administering the US CITES.
CITES was formed
If you haven't read Mary Motes book "Orchid Territory" you should. It's a
"kick." You can find info on it on The Orchid Mall unClassified Ads page or on
the Services, Supplies and Software page. Well worth the read and reasonable
priced, too.
Carson E. Whitlow
Adel, IA
__
What the convention requires and what is required by the US Officials does
not always match, in fact I can't say that CITES is applied uniformly
throughout
the US. Each country (and entry point) has its own little quirks and
interpretations.
As for Appendix 1 flasks, who on this list has impo
Nicholas Plummer makes a valid point of the potential of relocating plants
which are being destroyed by the bulldozer. Unfortunately, who is to do it?
And can that many plants be reintroduced or moved to safe ground? When it can
be done, it is done - as Tom has relayed to me on a couple of oc
I have known Tom Nelson for quite a number of years. He spent many hours
with me, learning how to properly handle, dig, and clean his salvaged
Cypripediums especially. I have found him to be very concerned about the
plants, and
taking all the legal measures necessary to collect them. He, in
With all the name calling, character assasinations, and other bull s--t
appearing on this list, it is fast becoming useless. Any more, I look at the
contents and usually end up deleting the entire thing. Because of it, I may
have
missed something which may have really been useful.
If the int
Peter,
That is the point - there is NO SURE WAY of telling artificially propagated
from wild collected, in flower or out, hybrid or species, let alone the
legality of the parents or the initial collection! CITES has set up definitions
which on paper sound fine, but are not realistic. CITES as
FOLLOW THE MONEY! IF THEY CAN'T TELL ARTIFICIALLY PROPAGATED MATERIAL FROM
WILD COLLECTED THEY SHOULDN'T BE IN BUSINESS!
"The kingdom's request for the exclusion of all artificially-bred
orchid hybrids from CITES appendices last week sparked a heated debate
among delegates from the European U
I think we all realize that Dr. Braem has a low tolerance for criticism. I
also think that there are those that are more than happy to bait him into
situations where he responds on a personal level. The last comment I sent to this
list dealt with much the same topic. I likewise have a short fu
Peter's comments regarding what is missing is really missing the point. If it is
legal to make the collections and offer them for sale, nothing else need to be said.
Those questioning the legality of the collections are free to do so and if they are
being illegally collected, appropriate autho
I just saw the latest ODG with the hate growing and I said to myself, this is
not accomplishing anything. I asked some simple questions and have now
gotten it embroiled in a big political uproar. Do I have to stop writing to the
ODG? Can't questions be answered without this hateful, political
I apologize for getting Norris Powell and George Norris mixed up in my
posting. Indeed, Kay is correct! (OGD< V6, # 283, Mess. 2).
My apologies to both and all!
Carson E. Whitlow
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.orchidg
I want to thank all of you that wrote me and ODG with your comments on the
two issues I presented recently. They were not published here to get them going
again, but as a different look at things. I was not condemning nor
supporting anyone - the case happened to lend itself to some straightfow
I found the article that Kay Barrett presented in V 6, 255, rather
interesting, especially since "Mr. Jiminez commended the investigative efforts of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and
Border
Protection Service, and the Department of Agriculture.
I was just reading the posting by Kay Barrett in Vol. 6, Issue 255, in which
it stated that " According to the Indictment and statements in Court, Arias
made several shipments of orchids to his co-conspirator, Norris, between January
of 1999 and October of 2003. Arias would obtain a CITES permit
I am not an attorney, but something sort of bothers me and I would like a
little input on it.
A lot has been said about Phrag. kovachii, the man who brought it in and
Selby Gardens. However, when we get right down to it, was it illegal, in regard
to CITES? What plant was brought into the coun
Frederick,
The first three words of CITES spells it out, and the first two don't count -
"Convention (on) International Trade."
Regarding native sites selling natural hybrids - that does not mean that the
products they are selling came from the wild. A natural hybrid is one that
occurs in the
Though I am in agreement with the removal of hybrids from CITES (all plants
should be removed from CITES as far as I am concerned since it is a trade
agreement not, a conservation measure), it is a start. The practical part of it
though is that to have the plants determined as hybrids you must
20 matches
Mail list logo