[OGD] =?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9?=Other Expenses

[Martin Epstein]

Thank you, Bill, much appreciated.  The explanation answers my 
question.  It's just that i am used to seeing such large (relatively 
speaking) numbers explained in more detail in financial statements. 
Of course the item should not have been booked in the first place: a 
sale is not a sale until you have the money.  I am sure that there 
was no fraudulent intent to make the P & L look better in a previous 
year.

BTW, I want to complement you on your clear description of how you 
plan to handle the election process should another slate be proposed. 
It would be a good model to apply to an explanation of the state of 
the AOS finances.  The latest data I have are from the public record 
for the year 2001 (the tear ending 06/30/04).  I hope the finances 
have improved over the last two years.

Martin
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids