Hi,
I am using "memory" graph: my OrientDB graph is an in-memory datagraph over
an Oracle Database.
In OrientDB 1.5 the composite index was working well for "memory" graph (I
have done all my tests with 1.5). But not any longer in 1.7 so I am using a
naive BTree impementation as an index repla
Hi,
Are you still using "local" storage?
Lvc@
On 6 June 2014 11:01, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Even when I use no index at all. There are thousands of lines of log with
> this useless (because no index is used) Warning.
>
> Not only annoying, it slows down the software too.
>
> Does anyone know how t
Hello,
Even when I use no index at all. There are thousands of lines of log with
this useless (because no index is used) Warning.
Not only annoying, it slows down the software too.
Does anyone know how to remove this ?
Thomas
Le mardi 6 mai 2014 13:22:18 UTC+2, Lvc@ a écrit :
>
> Hi Arnaud,
Alright, thanks for the follow-up!
Le mardi 6 mai 2014 13:22:18 UTC+2, Lvc@ a écrit :
>
> Hi Arnaud,
> current version of memory storage doesn't support it, but it's planned for
> 2.0.
>
> Lvc@
>
>
> On 6 May 2014 10:52, Arnaud BOS > wrote:
>
>> The same warning is logged into my log when using m
Hi Arnaud,
current version of memory storage doesn't support it, but it's planned for
2.0.
Lvc@
On 6 May 2014 10:52, Arnaud BOS wrote:
> The same warning is logged into my log when using memory.
>
> Le lundi 14 avril 2014 00:48:34 UTC+2, Lvc@ a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>> are you using local? You sho
The same warning is logged into my log when using memory.
Le lundi 14 avril 2014 00:48:34 UTC+2, Lvc@ a écrit :
>
> Hi,
> are you using local? You should migrate to plocal.
>
> Lvc@
>
>
>
> On 13 April 2014 23:36, > wrote:
>
>> WARN *Current implementation of storage does not support sbtree
>>> c
Well that was easy - it worked, thanks, awesome!
Running it embedded and deploying it directly with the Java webapplication
- works amazingly well!
Thanks,
Stefan
Am Montag, 14. April 2014 00:48:34 UTC+2 schrieb Lvc@:
>
> Hi,
> are you using local? You should migrate to plocal.
>
> Lvc@
>
>
>
>
Hi,
are you using local? You should migrate to plocal.
Lvc@
On 13 April 2014 23:36, wrote:
> WARN *Current implementation of storage does not support sbtree
>> collections* [ODatabaseRecordAbstract$1]
>
>
> Dear ODB users & team,
>
> I kindly ask for advice on why I get this message and what
>
> WARN *Current implementation of storage does not support sbtree
> collections* [ODatabaseRecordAbstract$1]
Dear ODB users & team,
I kindly ask for advice on why I get this message and what I can do to fix
it so the warning does no longer spam my log.
I'm running 1.7RC2
Thanks for any ad
