If you want to use your parser, then storing it as a string is good
solution.
Lvc@
ᐧ
On 25 August 2014 22:05, alexander anguiano wrote:
> I'm currently just copying the fields from the query.
>
>
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:38:28 AM UTC-5, Lvc@ wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander,
>> With DocumentDBs
I'm currently just copying the fields from the query.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:38:28 AM UTC-5, Lvc@ wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
> With DocumentDBs this is an embedded field, so:
>
> Create property embedded EMBEDDED Test;
>
> To create an embedded object of type "Test". This is automaticall
Are you using Object Database interface?
Lvc@
ᐧ
On 25 August 2014 20:33, alexander anguiano wrote:
> Is there a way to not have a pojo mapping? Can i just use jackson. If
> yes, what would the calls be?
>
> Also i'm using the SQL, will i have any problems with that?.
>
>
>
> On Monday, Augu
Is there a way to not have a pojo mapping? Can i just use jackson. If
yes, what would the calls be?
Also i'm using the SQL, will i have any problems with that?.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:38:28 AM UTC-5, Lvc@ wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
> With DocumentDBs this is an embedded field, so:
>
> C
Hi Alexander,
With DocumentDBs this is an embedded field, so:
Create property embedded EMBEDDED Test;
To create an embedded object of type "Test". This is automatically
converted from/to json when you work on it.
Lvc@
ᐧ
On 25 August 2014 17:32, alexander anguiano wrote:
> Is it possible to
Is it possible to create a class that has a field of json?
Create Class Package extends V;
Create property name string;
Create property myjson ?;
what type would this be?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe
