Re: Orion 1.0 : Problem With Access DB (Ultradev Tutorial)...

2000-06-24 Thread Luis Arias
Hello ! As you suggested, I started looking at Dreamweaver Ultradev's generated code: Driver DriverrsReleaseSummaries = (Driver)Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver").newInstance(); Connection ConnrsReleaseSummaries = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:scaalcoffee","","");

Re: Server stability, performance

2000-06-24 Thread thm
I am also interested by the comparaison with the others Application Server like Weblogic and Gemstone. Thanks ThM [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.idocw.com Jason Rowland a écrit : I have been using Orion to develop for about two months now and love it. Soon I will need to deploy my application.

Re: Pet Store and UserManager problems

2000-06-24 Thread Wong Kok Wai
Hi, Isn't JAAS supposed to address this area? Magnus Stenman wrote: The PetStore and the ATM both use the XMLUserManager (implicit default), ie principals.xml on our live site. If you need a clustered version you need to pick one of the other usermanagers provided (ie DataSourceUserManager

Re: Orion 1.0 : Problem With Access DB (Ultradev Tutorial)...

2000-06-24 Thread Brian Cunningham
This is sort of a general comment about JDBC, ODBC and Access, but it may help Luis as well: Unlike many people I like Access...for some things. I especially like it for schema prototyping and uploading data that people have entered into spreadsheets. But using it with JDBC via Sun's JDBC-ODBC

java.naming.factory.initial value for Orion?

2000-06-24 Thread Gary Shea
Hi -- This is one of those newbie questions, I know, but I can't find any reference to what the java.naming.factory.initial value should be for Orion! TIA Gary

Re: java.naming.factory.initial value for Orion?

2000-06-24 Thread Gary Shea
Ok, bad sign, I'm answering my own posts. After winnowing through the contents of the orion.jar, I've determined that it's possible to use com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIInitialContextFactory for the value of java.naming.factory.initial, although I have no idea if it's a _correct_ value ;) Using