Hi,

as far as I know there is no cluster support for EJBs with the current version of the 
Orion server.
Hence this means that the WebContainer and EJB Container are executed in the same 
virtual machine by default. 
This is ok, since RMI calls are expensive, so, if you don't have massive Front-End 
processing then you're not interested
in separating the Web- from the EJB container.
I guess Orion is doing the same as BEA WLS 5.1, this means, if the RMI call is going 
to the same virtual machine then it is resolved as a local call.
The specification of local references is just an effort to make this performance 
optimization explicit and binding. 

Cheers,

Markus Meisterernst


*******************************************************
T-Systems CSM GmbH
Markus Meisterernst
IT Architekt
SyL Databases & Middleware 13
Landgrabenweg 151
53227 Bonn
Tel:      +49 228 936 3442
Fax:      +49 228 936 3476
E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: www.t-systems.de
*******************************************************

>If anybody is at JAOO this week, please ask Karl about this.
> 
>Regards,
> 
>the elephantwalker
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Solinsky,
>Jason
>Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:01 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: EJB 2.0 Approved
>
>
>I haven't seen anything here about this:
> 
>http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp
><http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp> 
> 
>The EJB 2.0 Standard was approved by the Java Community Process on
>Wednesday the 4th. Now that the orion developers can be sure that the
>standard will not change, what sort of timeline can we expect for
>implementation? The most critical component for me is the Local
>Interface.
> 
>It is interesting that at Java One Larry Ellison bragged about how
>Oracle would be the first to implement EJB 2.0 using their brand new
>platform (Orion didn't get any direct mention). If Orion (or Oracle) is
>truly is to beat Weblogic in this race, then there must already be some
>developed code that hasn't been released.
> 
>JWS
>
>
>
>This e-mail communication and any attachments are confidential and
>intended only for the use of the designated recipients named above. If
>you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
>have received this communication in error and that any review,
>disclosure, dissemination, or distribution of it or its contents is
>prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
>notify USPowerSolutions Corporation immediately by telephone at
>(617)547-3800 or via e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy all
>copies of this communication and any attachments. 
>
>
>
>
                   
                              




Reply via email to