ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Magnus Rydin
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: SV: CMP 2.0 OR mapping problem
Please remember that the EJB 2.0 spec is not yet released.
Although the Orion Team has always be known to be fa
]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:18 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 OR mapping problem
>
>
> Bidirectional relationships do not yet work.
>
> There are two workarounds that have worked for me:
&g
Title: SV: CMP 2.0 OR mapping problem
Please remember that the EJB 2.0 spec is not yet released.
Although the Orion Team has always be known to be fast to implement early specifications,
this is a costly arrangement as specifications change.
Personally I hope that EJB 2.0 relations will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:18 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 OR mapping problem
Bidirectional relationships do not yet work.
There are two workarounds that have worked for me
StorefrontHome. Then you just
need to make sure that the storefronts->marketplace reference is kept
solid.
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael A Third [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:37 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: CMP 2.0 OR mapp
I have been trying to get Orion to correctly map a non-dependant
bidirectional 1:N relationship using EJB 2.0. It tries to generate a
collection mapping that uses a third table to hold the reference. I was
able to deploy it properly using a unidirectional relationship.
Here is the relevant entr