RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES

2001-03-18 Thread Gary Shea
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Shea Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 6:00 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yes, put your common classes in the EJB

RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES

2001-03-17 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR. EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR. WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR. -mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josh P Motto Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 10:21 PM To:

RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES

2001-03-17 Thread Gary Shea
Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR. EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR. WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR. -mike I didn't know that... cool! Is that a J2EE-defined behaviour, or is it orion-specific? Yet another solution is

RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES

2001-03-17 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR. EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR. WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR. -mike I didn't know that... cool! Is that a J2EE-defined behaviour, or is it orion