Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Shea
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 6:00 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: REFERENCE WAR CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES
Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, put your common classes in the EJB
Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR.
EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR.
WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR.
-mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josh P Motto
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 10:21 PM
To:
Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR.
EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR.
WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR.
-mike
I didn't know that... cool! Is that a J2EE-defined behaviour,
or is it orion-specific?
Yet another solution is
CLASSES FROM EJB-JAR FILES
Mike Cannon-Brookes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, put your common classes in the EJB JAR.
EJB JAR's can't see classes in your WAR.
WAR's can see classes in your EJB JAR.
-mike
I didn't know that... cool! Is that a J2EE-defined behaviour,
or is it orion