t abstract since I was
missing the field in the descriptor.
Thanks for your help Jim.
-tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Drury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:41 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
gt; To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
>
> OK Tim. Let me know if you don't find it by some time this
> evening and I
> can look it over this weekend. All I ask is that if you do
> find it you let
> me know so I can not pu
CTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:46 PM
> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
>
> OK Tim. Let me know if you don't find it by some time this
> evening and I
> can look it over this weekend. All I ask is that if y
site.
>
> -tim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:16 PM
>> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
>> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>>
>>
>> Tim, I j
-tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:16 PM
> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
>
> Tim, I just reviewed your messages again, a bit more
> carefully
>> From: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 2:31 PM
>> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
>> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>>
>>
>> Hi Tim...
>>
>> No, I didn't mean in the relationship tag. Sor
10, 2000 2:31 PM
>> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
>> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>>
>>
>> Hi Tim...
>>
>> No, I didn't mean in the relationship tag. Sorry for the
>> confusion. My
>> fault entirely. I meant in the tag.
&g
1 PM
> To: Tim Drury; Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
>
> Hi Tim...
>
> No, I didn't mean in the relationship tag. Sorry for the
> confusion. My
> fault entirely. I meant in the tag.
>
> The descriptor I pasted below is
t;
>
> EdiEnvelopes-belongsto-EdiFile hip -role-name>
> many
>
> EdiEnvelope
>
>
>ediFile
>
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, N
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:14 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Cc: Tim Drury
> Subject: Re: ejb2: EJB->DO, 1 to many problem
>
>
> Hi Tim...
>
> I'll take a stab at trying to help with this. I have done a
> lot of work
> with depe
Hi Tim...
I'll take a stab at trying to help with this. I have done a lot of work
with dependent objects.
First, using Orion 1.4.0 I found that unidirectional dependents work as
they should (when an EB has dependents). If you have an EB with dependents
in a 1-to-1 relationship, Orion will cre
I've gotten EJB->dep obj working for 1-to-1 and
I've gotten EJB->EJB 1-to-1 and 1-to-many working.
But for the life of me, I cannot get EJB->dep obj
working for 1-to-many.
The object model is:
EdiFile(EJB) 1 to N - EdiEnvelope (DO)
This is a unidirectional relationship. I think
someo
12 matches
Mail list logo
