On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 12:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
The X-ABRELATEDNAMES properties were not generated. The labels should be
redundant, but some peers get confused. Google preserves them as
stand-alone X-ABLabel without tag. DAViCal preserves them with tag,
which then happened to confuse
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 17:29 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I think the code which deals with group tags must use the same logic
that I introduced for sharedfield: a property which has a group field
array, but no group tag, must set an unassigned value in the group field
array,
That was already
