Hello Lukas!
Thanks a million for working on this over the weekend.
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 02:50 -0700, Lukas Zeller wrote:
Patrick, can you verify the patch solves the delete case you ran into?
Yes, but I myself won't have time before tomorrow. Congwu, what is the
right invocation of
Patrick wrote:
Yes, but I myself won't have time before tomorrow. Congwu, what is the
right invocation of client-test to trigger the endless 222 loop with
Funambol, assuming that the loop detection is removed? I want to
double-check that the real loop is still detected.
CLIENT_TEST_RESEND=t,
Hello Patrick,
On Oct 16, 2009, at 18:16 , Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'm afraid the 222 loop detection that Congwu added for the message
resend situation has negative side effects in other cases. Negative
like
aborting a sync prematurely. I'm glad I found this before releasing
SyncEvolution 0.9.1
