The issue here was emulating a check box in a console, not representing
true and false in the code. That would be confusing if I was trying to
do that in the code, but this is just to print.
Wesley
Erich Focht wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 19:24, Bernard Li wrote:
Hey Wesley:
Hey Wesley:
Wouldn't it be better to have a function which returns true or false
instead of creating extra variables to hold the string?
Also, there might already be a built-in function to convert 0 to false
and 1 to true - not 100% positive though.
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
of the variable?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Erich Focht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 15:48
To: oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bernard Li; Wesley Bland
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] [Oscar-checkins] r5238 - trunk/lib/OSCAR
On Thursday 27 July
