OSS and proprietary software should co-exit side by side. Having to force
all software to be open source is like saying all RD must be completely
open (i.e. in academia) rather than allow commercial RD. There is a
symbiotic relationship between academia and commercial research, and this
should be
they don't want it... how can we deal with them. tell me how to make them
say yes
I've have an example yesterday one of my customer called said his lappy got
in to virus problem. Way before he bought it from me I've told them to dual
boot with a linux distro and they've said NO
If only I could be
I think I've inspired this topic with my comments on a Google+ conversation,
but Mr Haris and many others have misunderstood me.
To be very clear, *I've never said that it is wrong to use Non-OSS*. No one
has... Where did that idea even come from? The only person I've ever known
to say that is
Team,
Truly. Its up to my neck now, seeing comments, telling me to make sure
all to be in OSS even in conference, in my photos and things that I do
as OSS advocate.
We are too into it and forget what the users think. From 301 people
attending the MOSC2011 conference, I truly can see only us, the
ya tuan, we are scaring others by telling them it's wrong to use M$. Saya
nak titipkan sebuah phrase baru dalam bahasa melayu yang pastinya memihak
kepada mereka.
Ada aku kesah?
Bunyi cam kasar skit tapi cuba lihat muka muka mereka bila kita kata pasai
M$ dan kebaikan OSS. Bolehlah disimpulkan
5 matches
Mail list logo