[osg-users] OSG 2.6.1 and VPB

2009-01-24 Thread Michael W. Hall
I have built OSG 2.6.1. Now I am trying to get the VPB to build. I got the latest from SVN, but I see that the chart says VPB r924 is the one to use. Could someone tell me how to get the version of VPB that will compile against OSG 2.6.1? I am using Fedora Core 10 x86_64. Thanks, Michael __

Re: [osg-users] New SVN Broke osgAnimation?

2009-01-24 Thread Ryan Morris
UPDATE: I un-installed the Ubuntu Blender package, installed 2.48a and the latest exporter. I am able to export the provided robot.blend to robot.osg and it works with osganimationviewer. However! when I export the rigged models from Blender Nation or my own i get a seg fault. Just FYI hope this h

Re: [osg-users] New SVN Broke osgAnimation?

2009-01-24 Thread Ryan Morris
Ok I have some information that may help you. I can run osganimationviewer against the robot.osg file provided with the Blender exporter, however when I download the robot.blend and export it the resulting file begins with osgAnimation::AnimationManager { instead of Group { when I export one of

Re: [osg-users] Bug Report: Windows GraphicContext Size, latest SVN Version

2009-01-24 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Adrian, i am working with windows vista,may this cause the problem Me too. Let's see other potential sources of differences: I'm on VC8 (2005) sp1, on an nVidia 7900GTX 512MB, driver 178.24. One thing is that I don't have the absolute latest SVN, I think my version of OSG was compiled f

Re: [osg-users] Bug Report: Windows GraphicContext Size, latest SVN Version

2009-01-24 Thread Adrian Egli OpenSceneGraph (3D)
i am working with windows vista,may this cause the problem /adrian 2009/1/24 Jean-Sébastien Guay > Hi Adrian, > > There is a bug in the osgViewer behaviour. >> >> set OSG_WINDOW=100 100 512 512 >> osgviewer model >> >> press 'F' Toggle fullscreen -> just 512x512 are rendered >> > > Can't r

Re: [osg-users] Bug Report: Windows GraphicContext Size, latest SVN Version

2009-01-24 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Adrian, There is a bug in the osgViewer behaviour. set OSG_WINDOW=100 100 512 512 osgviewer model press 'F' Toggle fullscreen -> just 512x512 are rendered Can't repro here. Both set OSG_WINDOW=100 100 512 512 osgviewer cow.osg (then press 'f') and osgviewer --window 100 100 512 512

[osg-users] Bug Report: Windows GraphicContext Size, latest SVN Version

2009-01-24 Thread Adrian Egli OpenSceneGraph (3D)
Hi Robert, There is a bug in the osgViewer behaviour. set OSG_WINDOW=100 100 512 512 osgviewer model press 'F' Toggle fullscreen -> just 512x512 are rendered once we start without the OSG_WINDOW env var. it works without any problem /adrian -- ***

Re: [osg-users] Inconsistency for INSTALL target and BUILD_DOCUMENTATION

2009-01-24 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Mattias, I don't think I can produce a fix before 2.8. Others are welcome of course ;-) Nah, don't sweat it, as I said it's just a minor inconsistency. We could in fact just document it and it would be sufficient I think. Thanks for explaining the details, it makes it clearer for me. J-

[osg-users] osg2.4 for VS Express 2008

2009-01-24 Thread Amit Kalhapure
Can anyone plz tell me, how to install and use OSG 2.4 or higher version in VS Express 2008.I am not able to install even by reading tutorials. Can anyone plz explain it to me in simple way     Thank you.. ___ osg-users mailing list osg-

Re: [osg-users] Inconsistency for INSTALL target and BUILD_DOCUMENTATION

2009-01-24 Thread Mattias Helsing
Hi J-S, On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote: > Hi all, > > I just noticed a small inconsistency. Normally, the INSTALL target should > have as dependencies any other targets that it needs to install. But it > seems that the documentation targets (openscenegraph_doc and > o

Re: [osg-users] Please test svn/trunk in prep for 2.7.9 dev release

2009-01-24 Thread Adrian Egli OpenSceneGraph (3D)
VS 2005 c++ : OK Adrian 2009/1/24 Paul Melis > Robert Osfield wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to finish this week with a 2.7.9 dev release, could users > > do a check out of svn/trunk and let know if your build succeeds/or > > where it fails. > > > With xine-lib-1.1.15 I get: > > > [ 83

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Jason Beverage
Hi Jan and Robert, If you run osgearth_seed on the simple_caching.earth file does it also segfault or does it only segfault when you don't have a cache defined? Thanks! Jason On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Jan Ciger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jason Beverag

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Jan Ciger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Beverage wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just committed some CMake fixes and osgEarth now builds and runs > for me on Ubuntu. > > The only thing I had to do extra to get it to work was manually copy the > plugins generated by osgEarth to the osg

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Jason Beverage
Hi RJ I'm getting the same error from the gdal plugin in ubuntu. On windows I'm using fwtools and it works fine. Im heading out of town today but I'll take a look at it as soon as I get back tommorow. Thanks! Jason On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Rahul Jain wrote: HI Glenn, Great work !

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Glenn Waldron
Hi Robert, Indeed, you do need to set up a cache in the earth file in order to seeding to work. (It shouldn't crash of course - that is a bug.) There are two examples of how to set up caching in the "tests" directory: "simple_caching.earth" shows a single, map-level cache "advanced_caching.earth

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Rahul Jain
HI Glenn, Great work ! I am testing your project and the results are phenomenal. The best example i like is traffic.earth, combining data from google and yahoo is simply awesome :) But i am facing problem while loading local data through osgEarth. I created a simple boston.earth file containi

Re: [osg-users] Please test svn/trunk in prep for 2.7.9 dev release

2009-01-24 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to finish this week with a 2.7.9 dev release, could users > do a check out of svn/trunk and let know if your build succeeds/or > where it fails. > With xine-lib-1.1.15 I get: [ 83%] Building C object src/osgPlugins/xine/CMakeFiles/osgdb_xine.dir

[osg-users] osgWidget warnings (was Re: Please test svn/trunk in prep for 2.7.9 dev release)

2009-01-24 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: > I would like to finish this week with a 2.7.9 dev release, could users > do a check out of svn/trunk and let know if your build succeeds/or > where it fails. > While compiling svn r9545 I got these warnings with gcc 4.1.2: [ 34%] Building CXX object src/osgWidget/CMakeFi

Re: [osg-users] Ideas for OSG v3.0 or how to make it younger :)

2009-01-24 Thread Adrian Egli OpenSceneGraph (3D)
Hi all It's really great to see how the community or the numbers of users grows each day, and it's also great to know that the openscenegraph is used many times in academic, commercial ,.. tools. And we all know that the work load for robert gets each day bigger and we have to discuss the near fut

Re: [osg-users] Please test svn/trunk in prep for 2.7.9 dev release

2009-01-24 Thread Paul Melis
Hi Robert, Robert Osfield wrote: > I would like to finish this week with a 2.7.9 dev release, could users > do a check out of svn/trunk and let know if your build succeeds/or > where it fails. > When I updated svn just now I saw:

Re: [osg-users] osgEarth - terrain on demand

2009-01-24 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Jason, I've just done an svn update and osgEarth now compiles and installs under Linux ;-) Running osgearth_seed I get a seg fault, perhaps associated with me not configuring a cache... osgearth_seed tests/google_imagery.earth Warning: Image Google maps satellite imagery has no cache. There

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-24 Thread Robert Osfield
HI JS, On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote: > Regarding this, I just did a build of current SVN and it went well, with the > latest warning fixes and suppressions it's pretty much warning free (didn't > pay close attention, I will next time I do a build). Good to hear. Tha