Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi James, Good to see that things are starting to work for you. I guess VS7.1 is a less tested compiler as it's getting a bit old. I have no interest in getting it to work personally as I don't use it, and I suspect that's Mathias's case too. If you want to make it work under 7.1, you're

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-27 Thread James Killian
/intuitive to use with unpredictable performance results. James Killian - Original Message - From: Jean-Sébastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:17 AM Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi James, Perhaps there should be plans to ditch 7.1 if no one is using it now. I think we should wait to see if anyone finds a fix so it compiles on 7.1. It has to come from someone who uses it though, as that's something that I personally can't check (since I don't have 7.1). Thanks for

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-26 Thread J.P. Delport
Hi, I was (thankfully) sleeping over some possibly nasty response last night to the earlier discussions, but was pleasantly surprised with all the messages this morning. Bob, thanks for your honesty. The force strong with this community is ;) jp Bob Kuehne wrote: osg-users, what fun

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-26 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hello James, Well I'll give Cmake 2.6 another shot. I tried it too early before and it had some strange behavior. Hopefully now since a lot of people are using it I'll feel a bit more confident that it will work. I may get back with you on the Install workflow, but I'll need to see how 2.6

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Paul Martz
, June 24, 2008 10:18 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file What was suppose to happen is that all of the changes were to be transparent in such a way where he need not write additional info. The problem

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Brian R Hill
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Killian Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:18 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file What was suppose to happen is that all of the changes were to be transparent in such a way where he

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Bob Kuehne
-- Forwarded message -- From: Brian R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file To: OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org I second Paul's statement - it breaks every

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Peter Wraae Marino
Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file To: OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org I second Paul's statement - it breaks every other project that uses osg. Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - To: 'OpenSceneGraph

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Bob Kuehne
as to the larger consequences... sigh. anyway, how's your new thing going? well? b -- Forwarded message -- From: Brian R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Bob Kuehne
osg-users, what fun would this list be if someone (lucky me) didn't get to stick their foot in their mouth from time to time. :) don't get me wrong: i think osg is by _far_ the best designed and implemented scenegraph out there. and robert does the best job at balancing an admittedly

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Bob, what fun would this list be if someone (lucky me) didn't get to stick their foot in their mouth from time to time. :) I assume you got some personal replies to your message, as I haven't seen anything on osg-users that reacted to it in any way, so your own reaction is a bit

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread James Killian
-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file Hi Bob, what fun would this list be if someone (lucky me) didn't get to stick their foot in their mouth from time to time. :) I assume you got some personal replies to your message, as I haven't seen anything on osg-users that reacted

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hello James, I think you're mixing things up. There are three different issues here: 1. The choice to use Config headers. 2. The fact that the Atomic header includes windows.h. 3. The fact that your version of CMake chooses the wrong configuration and does not generate the Config header.

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file

2008-06-25 Thread James Killian
- From: Jean-Sébastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] API configurations in aseparateConfig include file Hello James, I think you're mixing things up