Re: [osg-users] Building DICOM plugin with DCMTK

2011-04-13 Thread tim paige
Hi Chris, I am having the same frustrating problem with dicom plugin using 3.6. No matter how many times I reconfigure with CMAKE and regenerate, as well as playing with the FindOurDCMTK.cmake for the find utility... it refuses to put the additional include files in the solution files in my VC10

Re: [osg-users] Building DICOM plugin with DCMTK

2011-04-07 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Chris, I don't have any answers as I've only built DCMTK under OSX and Linux. There is a DCMTK community that is likely to be a good place to look up an answer to these problems. I would recommend using DCMTK over ITK, as DCMTK supports Dicom features better. Robert. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at

Re: [osg-users] Building DICOM plugin with DCMTK

2011-04-06 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
On 4/6/2011 11:59 AM, Simon Su wrote: > not sure if this is a solution but I found dmctk to be too much for me... > so I used > itk instead the osgdb_dicom.so file built using itk... what is the main > difference > in using itk or dmctk? I don't have any idea. I just saw DMCTK first.

Re: [osg-users] Building DICOM plugin with DCMTK

2011-04-06 Thread Simon Su
hi not sure if this is a solution but I found dmctk to be too much for me... so I used itk instead the osgdb_dicom.so file built using itk... what is the main difference in using itk or dmctk? thanks -s On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: > I'm investigating o

[osg-users] Building DICOM plugin with DCMTK

2011-04-06 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
I'm investigating osgVolume and the DICOM plugin for a client, and am having trouble building the DICOM plugin on Windows, VC++2008 (SVN trunk from a couple months back: 12159, 5:11:17 AM, Friday, February 11, 2011). I built dcmtk-3.6.0 successfully, and then configured all the DCMTK include a