Re: [osg-users] osgWidget performances

Hi Robert, Thanks for you help too. I'm very late on my osg posts but the mask were a good improvement, sufficient for now. But I'll keep in mind your suggestion for the future implementation. Thanks again everyone ! Regards, Vincent. Le 18/04/2012 10:13, Robert Osfield a écrit : Hi

Re: [osg-users] osgWidget performances

Hi, The masks was a good idea, and there is a little bit improvement but not enough in my case... I'm still trying to make some improvement using them, but without the expected success. So if you have any other idea... please share it ! Thanks. Regards, Vincent Le 16/04/2012 17:27,

Re: [osg-users] osgWidget performances

Hi Vincent, On 18 April 2012 08:55, Vincent Bourdier vincent.bourd...@gmail.com wrote: The masks was a good idea, and there is a little bit improvement but not enough in my case... I'm still trying to make some improvement using them, but without the expected success. So if you have any

Re: [osg-users] osgWidget performances

Nice idea, I'll look at this ASAP. Thanks! PS : other idea / tips are still appreciated :-) Regards, Vincent Le 16/04/2012 17:27, Kim Bale a écrit : Whilst I haven't used osgWidget, I know we had a similar performance issue with picking when we didn't use an appropriate node mask for

[osg-users] osgWidget performances

Hi all, I'm currently trying to find a performance improvement in osgWidget due to some lag we have in our application : We use osgWidget to manage some things at runtime, but we realized that performances were dropping in big scenes. Using profiler co, I found that the

Re: [osg-users] osgWidget performances

Whilst I haven't used osgWidget, I know we had a similar performance issue with picking when we didn't use an appropriate node mask for picking so that only the pickable objects in the scene are considered. I wonder if osgWidget has implemented one in it's pick handler. Regards, Kim. On 16